Paper Example on Population Health. The Opioid Crisis

Describe the Population Health concern you selected and the factors that contribute to it. The Opioid predicament is a healthcare matter that is recognized as an epidemic. The overdose of this issue is at the rate of petrifying in the United States, and several lives are experiencing problems related to consuming drugs like illicit fentanyl, narcotics, as well as heroin. These drugs are used for relieving pain to treat restrained to severe pain. In 2016, about two million individuals in America who were twelve years and above were recorded for abusing prescription opioids, and others about 591000 were abusing heroin, and this resulted to about one person for every 100 individuals were abusing these drugs in the U.S. According to Disease Control as well as Prevention Centres the number of deaths related to opioid has been increasing each year

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

Administration (President Name) President Trump

20th January 2017 to present President Obama

20th January 2009 to 2017 President Bush

20th January 2001 to 2009

Describe the administrative agenda focus related to this issue for the current and two previous presidents. The administration for Trump addressed the usage of chronic drugs as well as the abuse of narcotics by declaring the crisis of opioids like an emergency for public health under federal law. The administration for Trump launched the commission for the president on controlling drug addiction as well as the crisis for opioids.

The administration for Obama took additional policies to extend treatment access, strengthen prescription monitoring of drugs, enable safe unnecessary drugs’ disposal, as well as increase pain research and opioid use as well as abuse. In October 2004, the Strategic Prevention Framework, initialized as (SPF) was launched by the Bush Administration.

The framework for SPF establishes strategies for data to minimize the factors that were putting people into drug abuse effectively.

Identify the allocations of financial and other resources that the current and two previous presidents dedicated to this issue.More that one billion dollars in endowment has been assigned too plus spent correspondingly to the unlawful drug use as well as the abuse of nicotine by the Department of Health along with Services for Human being of the United States to help in belligerent against the crisis for opioid. In 2014, the Department of Health, as well as Human Services (HHS), estimated 4.3 million people who were likely to abuse opioids. An ample 930 million dollars portion proposed to fund in providing treatment as well as prevention for opioid abuse combat. An additional 352 million dollars was given to about 1232 Health Centres for the community to upsurge access to amenities for the disorder of substance use as well as mental health needs. Later, some other 194 million dollars in grand reserves were as well awarded to various places to conduct a study on the epidemic of opioids.

The federal funding was increased by Obama by 1.1 billion dollars to help the treatment programs for individuals anywhere in the United States. The administration funded 979.2 million dollars in the FY budget for the president through the program of Drug-Free Communities.

The treatment plan was funded by Bush by 600 million dollars for three years to help addiction encompassing the opportunity to look for treatment from community-based as well as faith-based programs.

Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue. They are reducing drug demand through awareness, education, and prevention.

• Safer plan prescription to ensure providers for health care endorse best opioid prescription practices.
• Active with the justice department to control the illicit drug distribution.
• Accessibility’s improvement in treatment programs for medication assistance for opioid abuse recovery.
• Expand the Naloxone and opioid antinode availability to law enforcement as well as first responders.

It is providing secure as well as convenient liable methods of disposing of unwanted prescription drugs. Educating the public concerning the narcotic overdose impact.

Drug screening.

Medical professionals were trained on methods of screening for drugs by open communication as well as physical signs identification.

Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis

Which administrative agency would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected?

The United States Drug Enforcement Administration. This agency helps to control illegal mass opioid drug quantities that enter the U.S.

Disease Control as well as Prevention Centres. It is used for preventing as well as collecting data.

The food along with Drug Administration. It is essential since it concentrates on a harmless healthcare provider as well as a professional’s prescribing plan.

The Administration for Substance Abuse as well as Mental Health Services. The mental health issues were noted by Obama’s administration is the contributing factor. The purpose of this agency is to educate people on prevention as well as treatment options. The Administration for Substance Abuse as well as Mental Health Services. The purpose of this agency is to educate people on prevention as well as treatment options.

How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the agenda for the current and two previous presidents? How does it stay there?

One way is through concern for public health that is identified. Another way is by proposal submission to the legislators explaining effective ways of handling the matter. Finally, the plan is fixed to the senate to be reviewed for approval. After the approval by the assembly, the bill that is proposed is forwarded to the president for it to be passed into legislation. As nurture, the standpoint would be to extant the appropriate data and research on the crisis for opioids to legislators. One way is through concern for public health that is identified. Another way is by proposal submission to the legislators explaining effective ways of handling the matter. Finally, the plan is fixed to the senate to be reviewed for approval. After the approval by the assembly, the bill that is proposed is forwarded to the president for it to be passed into legislation. As nurture, the standpoint would be to extant the appropriate data and research on the crisis for opioids to legislators. One way is through concern for public health that is identified. Another way is by proposal submission to the legislators explaining effective ways of handling the matter. Finally, the plan is fixed to the senate to be reviewed for approval. After the approval by the assembly, the bill that is proposed is forwarded to the president for it to be passed into legislation. As nurture, the standpoint would be to extant the appropriate data and research on the crisis for opioids to legislators.

Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue you selected for the current and two previous presidents?I would choose president Trump. His administration has formed an act of support. However, this is an act of history to control the crisis for opioids.

Fact Sheet: Fighting the Opioid Crisis.

Asking that you:

• Expand treatment availability for the struggle of Americans with opioid addiction.
• Expand Naloxone availability to law enforcement as well as first responders.
• Increase funding to minimize the rate of overdose deaths from unnecessary prescriptions for opioids.
• The Fact About Fighting the Opioid Crisis.
• The Opioid predicament is a healthcare matter that is recognized as an epidemic.
• These drugs are used for relieving pain to treat restrained to severe pain
• The opioid can turn to be physically dependent.
• Presidential Administration’ Types
• The Trump Administration
• The opioid crisis was declared a health emergency.
• The demand for the drug was reduced by awareness, prevention, education, and treatment.
• The Obama Administration
• Signed the Recovery and Comprehensive Addiction Act.
• Increased federal backing for 1.1 billion dollars for treatment programs.
• The Bush Administration
• Launched a Framework for Strategic Prevention.
• Funded a treatment plan by 600 million dollars for three years to help addiction.
• Grants Allowed as Well as Allocated to Reduce the Use of Opioid.

Nine hundred thirty million dollars portion proposed to fund in providing treatment as well as prevention for opioid abuse combat.

Three hundred fifty-two million dollars was given to about 1232 Health Centres for the community to upsurge access to amenities for the disorder of substance use as well as mental health needs.

One hundred ninety-four million dollars in grand reserves were as well awarded to various places to conduct a study on the epidemic of opioid.

Conclusion

Current U.S. leaders have given themselves to talk about the evolving issue of opioids. There are constant alterations as well as forms contingent on the one who is ruling and the one that serves as the partisan party in Congress as well as the seat of the Senate. Each leader of the presidency exhibits his propaganda, and objectives, along with ways of addressing the concerns for health care. The supporting organizations include disease control along with prevention Centres, Food along with Drug Administration for the United States, Drug Enforcement Administration for the U.S, and Mental Health and Substance Abuse Service Administration.