|Type of paper:||Argumentative essay|
|Categories:||United States Immigration Terrorism Social issue|
In essence, the issue of immigration is a bidirectional aspect in both its meaning and the related impacts. There is indeed a more considerable debate concerning those entering the United States. However, the discussion should not be biased to negatively affect those with good intentions with their coming, case example, the students. The Bible in [Leviticus 19:33-34 ]states that "When a stranger sojourns with you in your land you should not do him wrong.34 You shall treat the stranger who sojourns with you as the native among you, and you shall love him as yourself, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt, I am the Lord your God."
I strongly agree with the point of not opening the borders. God ordered the leaders to come up with laws that guide their people, and therefore, the immigration laws of the US are right since we believe that leaders do things which benefit the country's people. The only thing that should need consideration is thorough vetting on those entering at the borders (Moorhorse & Browne, 2016). The criteria should vary based on the intentions of each on their movement with students and government representatives facing less vetting. Moreover, the immigrants' country should influence the vetting process to some extent.
The argument in post one about looking at Jesus rather than the US is relatively vague. Based on the statistics, the US is a superpower majorly insecurity issues. It is therefore relevant that every individual and country faced with insecurity will sort out US support. The helpless citizens of countries like Iraq and Pakistan, which have continuously experienced terroristic attacks and may consider fleeing to the US (Fullerton, 2017). Their immigration does not present them as terrorists and thus preventing their entry will by exposing them to further attacks.
The point of addressing the security issues affecting the US basing on their degree needs deliberation. Terrorist attacks, which are relatively the chief threat to the well-being of most citizens, should receive stand attention from the Department of Homeland Security. "The need to contend with terrorism is evident in almost every sphere of life: security, prevention and suppression of terrorism, legal and ethical dilemmas regarding democratic issues, such as the individual's human rights, intelligence interrogations, the right of the public to know, as well as coping with social, psychological, and media-related issues." (Kaplan, 2017). The issue of formulation of new laws to complement the outdated would face challenges due to lack of consensus in the US Congress house making it tough to hand recent attack to the Southern part of US which never existed during the promulgation of the existing laws.
The current US has proposed the erection of a wall against parts of Mexico. "Donald Trump campaigned on seven major issues, two of which involved migration, viz, have the US build and Mexico pay for a wall on the 2,000-mile Mexico-US border and deport the 11 million unauthorized foreigners in the US." (Martin, 2017). Nonetheless, the president failed to recognize the negative impacts posed by this proposal. The business transaction between the state and Mexico together with other bordering countries will significantly be compromised and may reduce the overall GDP of the nation considering that most of its companies depend on exportation (Wike,2017). Furthermore, wall construction would imply sacrificing the peaceful relations with its borders and thus in the quest of attaining security, the process results to insecurity.
Generally, technological curbing of terrorism in the US is the best deal. Live cameras and locational data help even to counter planned terrorism before occurrence (Gardeazabal & Sandler, 2015). The advantage of this approach is the lack of discrimination against those with good motives.
Fullerton, M., (2017). Trump, turmoil, and terrorism: The US immigration and refugee ban. International Journal of Refugee Law, 29(2), 327-338.
Gardeazabal, J., & Sandler, T., (2015). INTERPOL's Surveillance Network in Curbing Transnational Terrorism. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 34(4), 761-780.
Kaplan, A., (2017). The counter-terrorism puzzle: A guide for decision makers. Routledge.
Lim, B. H., (2016). Exile and migration: Toward a Biblical theology of immigration and displacement. The Covenant Quarterly, 74(2), 3-15.
Magner, T., (2016). Refugee, Asylum, and Related Legislation in the US Congress: 2013-2016. Journal on Migration and Human Security, 4(4), 166-189.
Martin, P. L., (2017). Election of Donald Trump and migration. Migration Letters, 14(1), 161-171.
Said-Moorhouse, L., & Browne, R., (2016). Donald Trump wants 'extreme vetting 'of immigrants. What is the US doing now? CNN, August 16.
Wike, R., Stokes, B., Poushter, J., & Fetterolf, J. (2017). US image suffers as publics around world question Trump's leadership. Pew Research Center, 26.
Cite this page
Free Essay: The Curbing of Terrorism. (2023, Jan 13). Retrieved from https://speedypaper.com/essays/the-curbing-of-terrorism
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the SpeedyPaper website, please click below to request its removal:
- Free Paper Sample on Dabbawala Historical Background
- Free Essay on the Ethics of Social Media Accuracy
- Essay Samples on Saint Paul John the Great
- Free Essay Sample on Climate Change in North Seattle
- Left-Sided Heart Failure, Free Essay in Medicine
- Free Essay Sample: Historical Background and Purpose of Interpol
- Biography Essay Example: Frank Aloysius Barrett and John F. Kennedy