Sharia Law is losing popularity among some Muslims

Published: 2019-06-26 03:14:02
978 words
4 pages
9 min to read
letter-mark
B
letter
University/College: 
Type of paper: 
This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Sharia law is a mainstream law meant for universal application. There is absolutely no room for customization and blending sharia law to accommodate other significant variables such as culture, circumstances, morality among others. Sharia law is reluctant in embracing the overwhelmingly modern adjustments. Most Muslim states have been reluctant to join international humanitarian institutions as a state, however at an individual level, Muslims are freeing from their country where the law they believe is just and fair is practiced in the full spirit of Quran to secular states such as UK, France, Germany, USA among others seeking asylum. The sharia law known as the rule of will, is significantly used applied in the governance allowing those in power free way to commit untold inhuman acts, which eats up even their own. This is evidenced by ever growing numbers of Muslim immigrants freeing unjust persecution (McGoldrick).

Sharia law does not always blend with politics and economics as it is expected to be conforming to all societies since it is believed to be the Will of Allah. The Saudi Arabia and Islam state legal systems are primarily based on the Sharia Law. However, theres significant contract on the policies and punishments of the same systems; the Saudi Arabia is termed to be an ally to the USA, while the latter is arch enemies to the USA and the West states at large (McGoldrick). Sharia law does not advocate for research and development, which is a significant unit in the modern society, since in those ancient days, all was put in black and white in the Quran. Islamic states have been harshly and excessively punishing those who are alleged to be advocating for a Free State policies, they are labelled state enemies of capital punishment and executed in public.

Sharia law is gender insensitive.

Human rights societies and movement have done remarkable campaigns on gender equity. There has been a massive appreciation of women and youth empowerment in many countries in the world in the quest for economic empowerment. However this scenario cannot be the case for most of the Sharia Law governed states, where women and youths are treated as third class citizens. Women, however, have a significant burden of running the economy in such countries, if they are offered a fair opportunity. The sharia law is embedding the males to special privileges that are harmful to the society at large. There is sufficient awareness in every country of the potential of empowering the women and youths; this is exceptionally raising pressure among those tied up in the Islamic States (Dean).

In the male dominated Islamic states, males are notably significant outnumbered by women population. Among other causes, wars and political cashes have reduced the natural population of males significantly in Middle East, where Sharia Law is rooted. This is amazingly interesting, the male gender notably privileged by sharia law over the female are shrinking in number at an alarming rate. This perhaps is the natural balancing and regaining of equilibrium ignored by the Islamic sharia. There is a fierce underground movement for reforms, since the tyranny of numbers has played the role of shifting the plates of power distribution. However, there has been unusual lenience observed among the political arena among Head of States in middle East countries, in relation to execution of sharia law especially, where it is hard on women. This observation perhaps shows that political power is for those popular with the majority, who now happens to be the women and youths.

Some Muslim states have never known peace at their doorsteps. 90% of recent war-torn states have Muslims as Primary of significant populations; this reflects that Sharia Law facilitates war. It is a direct deduction; however, 90% is high confidence levels. According to Mashhour, article in war both sides lose. Muslim states have been a continual battle ground. There has been an immense loss of lives and property; war has been breeding economic hardship to the majority of the nationals. This has always been with great honor been justified as defending their country under Sharia Law. Massive loss of live should never be justified, rather be prevented at all costs. There will be a war at Muslim states as long as Sharia is the dominant source of law. The majority of the Nationals take no pride in the war that risks all they have spent all their lives building over the years. This justifies popping of the pockets of reformers, even though others have faced public execution for the same. The reform and struggles of resistance are gaining notable momentum since to stop the war spirit fueled by Sharia law, reformers have to be active. .

Immigration menace

There has been a surge in the immigrants from the Middle East and Asia. For instance over the past 12-year war-torn Somalia state, it has dispensed the adversaries of state war on the surrounding East Africa States and the United Nations. This is unnecessary evil and burden to many innocent parties. There is disruption of normal living for all. There is a deficiency in the sharia law if it can allow the very citizens it is meant to protect mercilessly be slaughtered at their door step and face public execution for mere slight offence, such as expressing their mind (Namli).

References

Dean, Jason. 'Debating Sharia: Islam, Gender Politics, And Family Law Arbitration'. Journal of Contemporary Religion 28.2 (2013): 335-336. Web.

Mashhour, Amira. 'Islamic Law And Gender Equality: Could There Be A Common Ground?: A Study Of Divorce And Polygamy In Sharia Law And Contemporary Legislation In Tunisia And Egypt'. Human Rights Quarterly 27.2 (2005): 562-596. Web.

McGoldrick, D. 'Accommodating Muslims In Europe: From Adopting Sharia Law To Religiously Based Opt Outs From Generally Applicable Laws'. Human Rights Law Review 9.4 (2009): 603-645. Web.

Namli, Elena. 'Universal Rights Versus Sharia? Reflections On The Moral And Legal Dimensions Of Human Rights Law And Sharia'. Religion & Human Rights 8.2 (2013): 139-161. Web.

sheldon

Request Removal

If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the SpeedyPaper website, please click below to request its removal: