Ethical problems in the law practice

Published: 2019-05-15 22:46:38
1099 words
4 pages
10 min to read
letter-mark
B
letter
University/College: 
Type of paper: 
This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Ethics: these are principles that dictate a person's moral behavior. The judges and the lawyers are required to be very rational in the way they make decisions. The choices they make may have several impacts on different people; therefore, anything they say should be based and guided by the professional code of ethics. This paper will examine the ethical problems that face the law practitioners both as an organization or a person. In addition, the paper will also consider the impacts of ethical problems both on the law professionals and also the clients. The judges and the lawyers are the core elements of the judicial system. Irresponsibility has been one of the greatest ethical primary concern in most cases. The legal offices contain crucial documents that supposed to be kept in proper and secure places. The documents are supposed to be available at any time when the documents are needed, (Morgan, T. D, & Rotunda, R. D, 2008). The irresponsibility of the law practitioners leads to controversy in the decision-making process. It is because, when these documents are unavailable when required, it will impact the judicial processes and maybe affect the decision to be made. Therefore, every office should be responsible and be ready to provide the information required may be needed. The judiciary is one of the major organs that determines the smooth running of the society. The court should listen to the appellants. The social class difference has been a major concern issue that affects every institution. The judiciary institutions are not left behind in this case. A person may come to appeal a case and instead of getting the assistance they need, they are discriminated against the social levels. In most cases, those who are socially disadvantaged do not win the cases. The discrimination made them fear even appealing any case against those in higher social classes. The primary function of the judiciary institutions is to promote equity amongst the public. The role has not been the case over the past years. Courts face different ethical problems that reduce the chances of its performance (Morgan, T. D., & Rotunda, R. D, 2008). The law practitioners are accused of being involved in different corruption issues. Either taking bribes that change the judgment process. The judiciary should promote equity in the decision. Lack of equity influenced the performance of most of the court systems. Most of the law practitioners especially those in the isolated areas may lack opportunities to share the experience with their fellows from different parts with different experiences. In most cases, ethical issues have been considered personal, and only the concerned person is required to determine his/her behavior. Taking things to personal level is wrong because, human beings face almost common problems that are usually universal. Therefore, sharing ideas may help to acquire knowledge and strategies to approach a problem.

According to Morgan, T. D., & Rotunda, R. D. (2008), lack of understanding is another problem that affects the law practitioners. Misunderstanding the role of each group in a judicial institution may lead to its poor performance. The judges should identify the difference between professional roles and personal roles. In most cases, the judicial decision has been interfered with the personal life of the person involved in making the decision. Morgan, T. D., & Rotunda, R. D. (2008) argues that the judge is supposed to be a person of integrity. He/ she should follow the professional code of ethics that should dictate what should be done, how and when it should be done. Most of the law practitioners have not been able to give the judiciary the respect it nay deserves. Lack of respect for the court has also contributed to the ethical challenges that the law institutions experience. The misunderstanding between personal and public lifestyle of the law practitioners have led to this lack of respect for judicial institutions. Therefore, the law practitioners should differentiate the two and apply the appropriate code of ethics required.

The code of conduct highly guides Law practicing, and this behavior should be evident everywhere in the institution and by every member of the judiciary. Privacy is one of the crucial concerns of law practicing and everyone whether guilty of the charges or not deserves privacy. The court deals with different cases of the different character of people. The differences may require the involved to maintain high level of secrecy to the clients. The documents are supposed to be kept safe; out of reach of the unintended persons. The information of the cases should be accessed only by the people allowed to have their access.

Sexual harassments are out of the professional code of ethics. Over the past years, there have been increased cases of sexual harassment that has made the society unbearable (Lerman, L. G., & Schrag.P, 2013). Especially if the involved party is a law practitioner. The judiciary is expected to protect the public. The public entrust their lives to the judiciary that they are safe. This trust is broken when the people expected to protect the public turns to be assaulting them instead of offering them protection. Harassment of clients is normally against any professional code of ethics and is highly punishable. The judiciary should emphasize on the public perception of the judiciary. The court serves the public, and if the public loses trust in the judiciary then it means the judiciary has no role to play in the society and hence should not be there.

Influence of the environment is another ethical problem that the law practitioners experience. The influence can be either from other institutions or even from the prominent people in the state. When the judiciary acts according to someone's interest it will have gone against the professional code of ethics of upholding the integrity of the judiciary (Lerman, L. G., & Schrag, P, 2013). Therefore, law practitioners should be always guided by the professional code of ethics that dictates their behavior and the way they make decisions.

In conclusion, the judiciary is the central point of the country's activities. Law practitioner should be guided by the code of ethics always. They are the role model of how the society should look like, and therefore it all starts with them. The committee of codes of conduct should be at the forefront in ensuring that the members uphold the code of ethics as may be required.

 

Works Cited

Lerman, L. G., & Schrag, P. (2013). Ethical Problems in the Practice of Law; Concise Edition for the Two Credit Courses. Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.Morgan, T. D., & Rotunda, R. D. (2008). Professional Responsibility; Problems and Materials: Foundation Press.

 

sheldon

Request Removal

If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the SpeedyPaper website, please click below to request its removal: