Are Athletes Overpaid? Exploring the Controversy | Essay Sample

The debate on whether or not athletes are overpaid has persisted for more than a decade. The fact that so many professional athletes enjoy high-end lifestyles and sign billion-dollar contracts while members of the esteemed professions remain underpaid stirs controversy among public figures. With sociology experts claiming a large percentage of the world’s population remains doubtful as to why the athletes need to be paid so much, it is hard to ignore the subject and pretend the fairness of such compensation can be justified by the athletes providing an endless source of entertainment for sports viewers and overall market demands that state the athletes have to remain in public view to be “marketable”. Today, we discuss the implications of this phenomenon and how it can affect societal expectations.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

Reasons Athletes Are Overpaid

Disparities in Economy

The amount of money an average basketball player earns in a single game cannot be compared to the standard salaries of essential workers, creating an economic disparity that is regularly addressed by critics. Those who oppose the nation’s fascination with athletes and sports entertainment insist that the stark contrast between the earnings of an athlete and a healthcare professional shows a distorted priority system in a society where entertaining others is valued more than individuals saving lives. It is true that an average teacher or firefighter is left severely underpaid, especially if you start drawing parallels between their professions and the amount of money a football player might earn in a season. There are also individuals saying that essential workers are not valued enough, which is true in a world where professional athletes can rely on contracts to keep their income intact.

Increased Market Demands

The popularity of athletes and the increased demand for their presence in all the major sports competitions can be explained by the basic principles of market value. The market operates on the principles of supply and demand, which implies that the amount of money the athletes earn monthly is proportional to the revenue that they generate. Ticket sales and sponsorships increase the revenue by millions of dollars monthly.

Naturally, athletes serve as primary entertainment during the broadcast nights, so they receive a significant percentage of the revenue income. However, critics insist that the hype is artificially created by social media representatives, resulting in broadcast nights that earn billions and merchandise sales that turn athletes into incredibly wealthy individuals overnight. The artificial hype perpetuated by social media is one of the reasons the sports entertainment industry is so glorified whereas essential professionals are often neglected and provided with far less compensation.

Career Limitations

Athlete supporters claim that the brevity of their career in the sports industry can justify the amount of money they earn monthly. This is true to a degree, as most athletes indeed retire in their early forties due to the inability to keep up with the increasing demands promoted by the sports industry. However, a reasonable counterargument to this statement would be the sheer size of the contracts offered to players at their career peak. Plus, the players who have already retired do not disappear from the public view completely. They often remain the center of attention, have loyal fans, and take strategic breaks to stage massive comebacks as media stars or professional sports counselors. This levels out the sentiments about the athletes not being able to enjoy a long career.

The Fame Aspect

It would be apt to point out that many athletes do not limit themselves to the sports industry alone, preferring to expand their influence over several spheres simultaneously. This provides them with the so-called celebrity factor that comes into view whenever sponsorship deals, ticket sales, and merchandise are involved. The marketability of certain athletes goes far beyond the football field where they reign supreme.

This is what ensures the audience is going to see their public appearances as something that elevates their celebrity status. For instance, some athletes will casually earn millions in public advertisements or promotions without having to participate in the sports competitions or demonstrate fabulous performance for the sake of the team. This raises concerns about the ethics of celebrity worship, with sports fans eager to fall victim to celebrity factor rather than an actual contribution to society.

The Role of Brands

Often, the legendary brands are desperate to secure famous athletes as their ambassadors. They know that a sponsorship deal with a famous athlete will bring them enormous market revenue and are therefore overjoyed to provide an opportunity for collaboration. An athlete who becomes an ambassador is rewarded with a billion-dollar contract and peace of mind. Critics insist that this creates a skewed perception of the athlete’s contribution to society. Partnering up with a famous brand and saying monologues on camera with the intention to promote the product should not be qualified as hard work. In some cases, the experts insist, this artificially inflated significance of what the athletes do can harm the representatives of other professions and distort our views of essential professions.

Ticket Prices and Accessibility

The salary of an athlete will directly depend on the revenue that has been generated from fans and sponsors. However, the more media deals an average athlete gets throughout their career, the higher is the subscription fee for a sports channel where you can watch them perform or the price of the merchandise that showcases their exceptional skill.

According to some critics, this approach may further burden the families who are already struggling to stay within budget due to the games and live performances being so costly. If the sports channels demand an increased subscription fee, this can strain the households to the point where they can only afford to watch the games at home. This poses the question of whether the athletes being overpaid can be justified by the audience that they generate.

Ethical Implications

Athletes having excessive wealth and enjoying lifestyles that seem ostentatious to middle-class representatives can trigger a debate on whether or not modern society has its values deteriorating. With so many people suffering from inequality and economic disparity, the lavish wealth of athletes and the money they earn in a month seem ethically unfair.

The disproportion is also emphasized by the fact that most of these athletes are currently retired and earn millions as they appear in public campaigns. This implies they don’t have to lift a finger to secure a life of wealth, while the lower economic classes have to struggle to make their way in life. This results in a society rooted in inequality where the wealth is concentrated in the hands of the few and those beneath the few are forced to watch the wealthy enjoy their lifestyles without a care in the world. It can also underline the difference between the rich and the poor, which is another ethical concern that should be taken into consideration when talking about athletes being overpaid.

The Accent on Entertainment

The overpayment of athletes creates a society where entertainment is valued more than its basic needs. The entertainment sector becomes a prevailing one at the cost of other sectors lagging behind, including the educational sector and the healthcare sector. Most critics underline the importance of distinguishing between what is truly vital for society and appeasing a small percentage of the public that wants to be entertained by live performances and matches.

The unnecessary accent on entertainment makes it clear that the government’s investments in sports rather than healthcare or infrastructure reflect the society's attitude toward athletes as opposed to healthcare professionals and teachers. It also perpetuates harmful stereotypes about these professions being somehow less dignified than those of sports professionals. The societal imbalance where culture is relegated to the background in favor of the sports industry can become exceptionally uninspired, as suggested by the critics who have been exploring the subject.

Conclusion

While athletes and their high salaries may indeed spark considerable controversy, they are not the only ones that have to be blamed. The sports industry is an enterprise that needs to be maintained with sales, revenues, athletes starring as the primary attraction for the matches, and merchandise. While it is easy to agree with the critics who claim that the society’s focus on sports entertainment can be detrimental, the athletes are not the only ones who profit from sports channel subscriptions and sponsorships.

After all, the industry is made of media and sponsors who also control the narrative and dictate whether the sales need to be inflated or the athletes should ignore their inconsistent performances in favor of the current promotions or sponsorship deals. However, the context of these implications does not negate the fact that the athletes are indeed responsible for the ethical and societal controversies voiced by the critics. The debate that pertains to athletes being overpaid is a complex topic that should be addressed with the utmost attention. A distorted value system created by the athletic community may reflect poorly on society and place unnecessary value on entertainment rather than essential professions.