Understanding Social Interactions: Social Cognition, Heuristics, Attention - Essay Sample

Introduction

A person comes to contact with the world and can only give feedback to the interactions once they fully understand their situation. The essay aims to highlight the three methods that come into question, and those are through social cognition, social heuristics, and social attention. The assessment will give a holistic view of these three methods’ impacts on social interactions and the self. The essay will answer questions about how we blend in our world due to our cognition development.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

For the essay to proceed effectively, proper definitions of these three concepts need to get set aside. According to Salley and Colombo (2016), social attention does not have an explanation but rather a general idea of what the term could encapsulate. However, they point out that it could be used interchangeably with non-verbal social communication. Social cognition deals with the way people internalize, store, and use information about others and social interactions. The last definition that will get discussed is that of social heuristics. Social heuristics are mental pathways used to ease the decision-making process and judgments of different situations. All three play a role in dictating human interactions with the environment and judging themselves from a set metric.

Social Cognition

One of the fundamental questions that we need to answer first is what exactly the self is. The self has been identified in many animals and provided a basic framework of what it could be. In humans, the process develops and becomes far more concrete as one age. Doherty highlights that once children have attained a certain age, specifically somewhere around grade school, they can gauge their social interactions and either contribute or get affected by them (Doherty, 2009). That example proves that children slowly develop the awareness that comes about due to understanding their physical appearance and how it will build others’ perceptions in the same environment. It could also get likened to the workings of an animal’s cognition. An animal that understands its situation and can identify itself can give results that are very similar to those presented by a human being in certain instances. It does not necessarily prove the superior intelligence of this animal. It could prove that the definition of the self is not limited to human beings, and multiple animal societies can relate to this particular phenomenon. We can also argue that lack thereof this concept in other animals could be a good indicator of what we may have in us that is not available to them.

Self-regulation is a process that occurs when one decides to change their behavior via self-influence. It plays a significant role in developing social cognition, as definitive steps occur in this state of self-regulation. One has to realize what they are doing; therefore, they will be self-monitoring to develop an accurate picture. Once that occurs, one assesses themselves according to their standards and the immediate situation (Bandura, 1998). The final stage will be reacting in the most appropriate manner that fits their self-assessment. In this way, we can conclude that self-regulation pushes us to interact favorably with our environment.

The self-concept involves the understanding that we have about our characteristics. It plays a considerable role in our relationships, and certain definite factors influence this. The studies show a substantial benefit if one chooses to look at the self-concept from group interactions (Nisbett, 2003). The social identity provides a logical basis for someone to assess their state of belonging. One who can relate well in such a relationship is more likely to address these other people’s associations. For example, one who has a friend called Joy would say, “I am Joy’s friend.” It also points to the view that the external influence could play a significant role in promoting different cultural and intercultural opinions on the relationship’s status in light of the self-concept.

When discussing cognitive development, the natural inclination to reason out between the differences of nature and nurture emerges. It is crucial to reason from the point of view that cognitive development requires both nature and nurture to work in cooperation. Siegler argues that the only reason a child can exist and function in the first place is nature (Siegler, 2020). He then states that the environment plays an active role in shaping the perceptions of the child. As ascertained previously, the environment builds our self-realization and self-regulation. A child with a specific phenotypic appearance will get a different perception of the environment due to how the external environment receives them. In that case, we can see one who has had a fair allocation of all the physically ‘pleasing’ genes is more likely to thrive with their environment and learn different lessons. We might perceive this as some preferential treatment, but the general assessment comes from human interactions with young ones. An enlightened reason to approach all others with equal treatment and reaction could otherwise prove to be a far more tedious task than expected for the person in the question. The studies' current conclusions show that it is more of a natural inclination to favor people who fit the cultural appeal.

Once individuals undergo adequate cognitive development, they are aware of the environment around them and what it has to offer. The direct implications that arise from looking a certain way affect the way an individual’s perception develops. Langlois et al. (1995) describe that easy-going and much more attractive infants get more attention than others. There is a better possibility of a child thriving in an environment with more nurture, which arises from nature.

Social Attention

Different research bodies indicate that the self, particularly the name and even one’s face, plays a significant role in our social attention. Siegler (2020) speaks of certain situations whereby one would be in an unfavorably noisy environment but still able to pick out their name were it to get called. Kuang discusses two polarities that influence our perceptions. One of them is the fixation of oneself and the prioritization of one’s information over others (Kuang, 2016). The other polarity is attending to others to build a proper inference as to what their intentions are. Kuang argues that instead of inclining these mechanisms exclusively and separately, the two scenarios compete to form a pattern to build upon our social attention.

The identification of extremes in Kuang's presentation is a good indicator of the tendencies people resort to. It is an inbuilt mechanism that provides a firm understanding of how people interact with each other and deal with multiple situations. In an example where someone is required to be selfless, the one who has this extreme fixation is likely to contribute. One who gets fixated on the self may also contribute if there is a good reward or reason. The reward could be of an uplifting kind. It could be a bonus that builds the status of this individual or qualities that define this individual. The behavior is akin to narcissistic inclinations.

My attention gets influenced by a few non-verbal cues and vocal expressions. Among the non-verbal cues that grab my attention is steady eye contact. It proves that there is a reasonable likelihood of paying attention to what I have to offer instead of my physical appearance. Another significant one is the tone they choose to use as they engage in discussion with me. An appropriately responsive manner is a useful indicator of empathetically gauge what you present and try to relate to it.

My personality brings about the situation above. My self-awareness makes me notice the slightest changes in attitude or even my friends’ preferential treatment towards certain people. It may play a significant role in the manner I contribute and interact in different settings. Such interactions are in reaction to the presentation of various cues by parties involved.

Both non-verbal and verbal cues contribute to my social contribution and attention. The atmosphere is unconducive for me; I would notice it and immediately try to evade the scenario. Better patterns of etiquette and speech may encourage the greater promotion of friendly interaction and self-confidence. Degrading language or evasive non-verbal cues could lead to a lack of confidence. It is a situation that could allow me to evade mental drag that would do more harm than improve my situation. One must take on the best approach to enhance themselves in the most protective way, for only an individual could understand the self-concept better than everyone else.

Social Heuristics

According to Montealegre and Jimenez-Leal’s (2020) argument, cooperation or defection occurs due to seeing the benefits people get from that particular interaction. The study further hypothesized that the good could arise by either leaving or remaining. In either of these situations, the person in question prioritizes their benefit or what may be best for them. In another condition, Stefanelli et al. talk about the presence of a situation where the self gets deprived of any immediate benefit. A difficult problem worked to reduce the needs of the self when large groups cooperated to solve it. A characteristic that they attribute to making humanity one of the most successful species.

For decision-making processes, the mental landscape can involve itself in a variety of methods to take shortcuts. One such way is the invocation of various cognitive biases that could impede the proper establishment of information. The self also considers the cheapest method to advance its needs in regards to time. Time constraints could effectively deprive the logical order of cognitive processes. Such pressure could lead to a decrease in the appropriateness of the work of the self in question.

Cognitive biases could play a role in easily fooling and impeding anyone who is not up to the mental task. In one instance, you would fail to judge a person's actions due to their outer expressions or appearance. It is called the Halo effect. Its consequences could bring up more strife and trouble than otherwise expected. Numerous situations have occurred that prove relying on shortcuts for mental direction should have some unintended consequences.

Psychometrically Sound Measures

The use of psychometrically sound measures to assess the research results tends to prove this method's effectiveness. In a study where the self would have to be analyzed to determine how it interacts with the environment, a broad number of parameters would get needed to develop a study with realistic capabilities in academia and application. The specificity of these parameters would only be reasonable when a few things get put into consideration. One such way it would go well is by first setting definitions for contested terms such as social attention. The next step would consider the observable and easily calculable parameters as they would give a more straightforward basis to work with data that can get reciprocated in different subsequent studies.

References

Bandura, A. (1998). Social Cognitive Theory of self-regulation. In Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 248-287.

Kuang, S. (2016). Two polarities of attention in social contexts: from attending-to-others to attending-to-self. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 63.

Langlois, J. H., Ritter, J. M., Casey, R. J., & Sawin, D. B. (1995). Infant attractiveness predicts maternal behaviors and attitudes. Developmental Psychology, 31, 464–472.

Montealegre, A., & Jimenez-Leal, W. (2019). The role of trust in the social heuristics hypothesis. PloS one, 1...