Essay Sample on Long Term Care and Migration

Introduction

German migration directed more outwardly than inwardly leads to a decline in population and ageing in its structures. Re-structuring of formal care policies led to an increase in care workers with migrant backgrounds. Development in care organisations encapsulated in long term care professionalism and migrant policies evaluation. Most workers with migrant experience had permanent employment and resident permits, while skilled workers, in contrast to the unskilled, enjoyed favourable employment conditions, though; they all faced challenges in daily residential care work. The intention to mitigate health-related problems and ensure long care assistance meets the need of numerous people who become dependent on long-term care later in life. Individuals with physical, intellectual, and mental disabilities could also depend on care (Federal Ministry of Health, 2020). Various measures have been implemented to cater for the individuals and migrants for dependent long-term care, as discussed in the paper.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

Engagement of Migrants

The European Union and the engagement of Migrants among other entities have facilitated effective evaluation of long-term care for migrants. The European Union is the legislative organ that governs the migration health commission among the European countries. The union evaluates and controls the health workers to ensure effectiveness and excellent performance by the workers. During Germany Poland migration, the union organised exportation of professional health workers among other migrants. The governance formed a coalition of parties to ensure health workers enjoy privileges in terms of finances and unique benefits. The program was to support the long-term care workforce and family caregivers in terms of delivering standard services to their customers, become the consumer choice and have the advantage of benefiting families.

The goal of the German Long-term Care Program was to promote the beneficiaries of the program in the nation. The long-term care aimed to provide salaries to the labour workers who participated in extended-term care services. The action was beneficial to the governing German local authorities as it would ease the burden of payments laid on them. The program was launched in 1995 and became a pillar of social security since it addressed the financial hardships of disability and chronic diseases (Nadash et al., 2018). The program was effective in operation until 2008 when a reformation took place to include counselling claimants and improving the services offered. (Nadash, 2018) The care would cover victims with dementia challenges and workers who felt underpaid before actualising their eligible claim benefits of between five to ten years. Another reformation took place in 2014 and 2015, intending to make changes to the current reformation through revising the assessment mechanism, improve the coverage of individuals with dementia and introduce a new earning replacement scheme where caregivers would make arrangements on their provision of care within ten days. The program also aimed to reduce the time taken for prospects to receive care by introducing rehabilitation benefits, improving access to short term care supplies, and improving the quality assurance for care services. The use would benefit both the caregivers and the patients who receive the services.

Migrant Care Workers

The effect of migrant care workers in German organisations was felt through service provision. Migrant health workers provided services in both the public and private sectors in the country. Their impact when the country faces an old-age staff scarcity crisis and a demand for funds by individuals at their old age, inadequately supplied (Caspar, 2016). The situation resulted in families taking care of their geriatric patients despite being unskilled and the task burdensome. Another challenge that resulted in the crisis is that migrant personnel were expected to take care of the elderly despite being unskilled and receiving minimum wage payments for their labour. The personnel was also expected to offer other house chores duties without an increment in their wages. The agreement between various employers was impacted as a result, and society through discharging house duties introduced an alternate and commuting program of a two-month cycle. An increase in the number of workers per family unit enabled the workers to receive classical personnel care and a shift of scale where the elderly would move into built facilities (Caspar, 2016).

Mobility care is related to the German political and socio-cultural aspects of society. Mobility care transitioning led to matters arising that diligent inquiry into the political and socio-cultural elements covered by the emergence and tenacity across borders due to the demand for long-term care in moderate prosperous European societies (Gentili, 2017). In Germany, long-term care was viewed as it covered a broad scope of study and area of interest. Procedures, including the ethical dimension, were put in place while recruiting workers into private households. Germany provided favourable working conditions for the migrant workers, considered the working experience while employing them into health facilities, observed the relationship between the workers and patients, and implemented strategies to ensure long term services were provided to long-term care individuals.

Development of health facilities and health organisations aimed to provide long-term care assistance. The growth and development of health facilities led to careful supervision of aged and ensured intact satisfaction for their needs. The government took the initiative to provide training programs to improve health workers' skills and capacity, provide funds to boost workers' working conditions, and encourage professional engagement in long-term care which initiated improved quality services, increased relationship connection between the workers and patients due to intimate discussion, concern, care of the patient's needs, and subtle details that resulted in trust and loyal service provision.

Demographic Effects

Demographic effects on the rising numbers of treatment cases and growing numbers of retirement age. The German society led in the numbers of ageing people, resulting in high demands for the health workers. The increase in treatment cases was equally the same as the number of old-age retirement professionals. Therefore, the health workers were few to offset the statistics of the demographic effect during the economically active period resulting in the creation of structural reasons for attractiveness, sharpen the worker's skills and enhance admirable social service traits among the workers.

The German care regime's role in the gender transformation and amendment is to provide long-term care among German citizens (Shire et al., 2020). The German care regime noticed a mutual preference among the families and the recipients of care services. Families opted to take care of their elderly while the elderly opted to receive care from the family members. Pfau Effinger (2015) exclaimed that majority of the population rejected the placement of elders in nursing homes, which was socially ethical. He further explained that political semantics characterised a family sloping culture of reliant family members in care provision. The political discourse emphasised family care delivery's cultural desire through expressions of love, wide-ranging services, and alleged personnel in contrast to care delivery in nursing homes.

Migrants care workers adapt to German society. Caregivers experienced diverse challenges during their working period over the years. Some of the challenges included: exploitation by the labour force to feminism and platitudinal requirements, high demands of emotional and moral course cultivation between the caregivers and the aged, and heavy requirements based on ethnic group and countrywide traits. However, they manoeuvred by identifying themselves with the slopes of the effect that enabled them to demonstrate their ability and racial requirements and distinguish their work and determination value. As a result, they acquired permanent residence and citizenship in German society.

An advantage of older individuals receiving care from homes entailed full attention out of the migrant's caregivers with anticipation to please the family members leading to the recipient's safety and life longevity. In contrast, individuals receiving care from public facilities experienced less attention than the countless numbers in the facilities and the workers' urge to discharge duties. The corporation between the service provider and result beneficiaries resulted in a mutual agreement of much quality workforce delivery. Health workers joining the school fore were encouraged to adhere to appropriate training and adapt to the lessening institutions' values. They placed a high cutting edge of high demand for such skilled workers since society demands the best.

Long-Term Insurance Care

Long-term Insurance cover was issued through an insurance scheme in the 1990s. The funds provide for individuals in need of daycare and the inability to meet the requirements as per the nursing services requirements (Hajek et al., 2017). The funds were untaxed, and since they were limited in the number of people accessible, some residents were forced to purchase additional insurance privately (Holch, 2016). Family caregivers who provided services for the elderly at homes received transference payments from their working places. The government finances private nurses through the revenue of wages and commercial adjustments to convey permanent caregivers. The average monetary support for commercial care provision and unrestrained finances that conveyed families was essential for the German care policy to promote employment opportunities for migrants nursing in independent households.

Care Policy adjustments to improve the employment of migrants nursing in independent households. In Germany, migrants labourers originated from different parts of the world, specifically Eastern Europe, Poland, Latin America, and Asia. German government recognised the need to stabilise immigration and therefore supported the migrants who became locally adapted to their culture in 2005. A distinct guest labour structure was constructed for workers' induction and enrollment to control and regulate immigration movement in various states. However, Germany remained a terminus motion for immigrants due to factors engaging family restoration and establishment laws' follow-up. Soviet Unions and the Eastern European States considered migration frail hence recruited expert labourers with precedence.

On the other hand, German adjusted its ethnicity to create an optimistic equilibrium perception for migration and protect the human rights privileges for refugees through the migration rule. Native work guidelines cater to the care effort, which seemed unskilled and undesired to change its perception. In other nations like Italy, Spain, and Austria, there lacked a formal portion and enlistment program for the labourers resulting in authorisation remissions disclamation. Germany's efforts to protect its workers gained a solid foundation through the long-term care policy.

Conclusion

The government aimed to protect caregivers' rights and privileges to ensure a continuous flow of labour force and unification of public and privates sectors to continually assess the elderly, mentally challenged, and other needy people. The goal achievement was by improving social amenities facilities, acquire standardised requirements, and discharge equal exhibition to rendered services.