Paper Example on the Humanitarian Organizations and Protection Projects for Donors

Reasons posed by the two non-governmental organizations on their actions to the protection situation

There have been parallel opinions concerning recurring programs by both government and non-governmental organizations to the armed conflict situation protection and procedures. Several questions have been raised on how to prevent and alleviate the suffering of civilians in armed conflicts (Doosy et al., 2016). My statement focuses on the key areas as well as the principles of impartiality and neutrality. The first area is when civilian populations are not protected during the conflict and other situations of violence. This has led to millions of people living in separate and terrifying places, and there is nothing more urgent than protecting them.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

The armed conflicts have led to the protection crisis of the highest order (Mukkamala & Beck, 2016). The overwhelming percentage of people killed or injured by explosives and weapons in populated areas are just civilians. They are mothers, fathers, and children who are not part of the fight and would wish to enjoy their lives, not posing dangers to them (Weissbecker et al., 2019). The second key area is how attacks, obstructions, and threats against good health care, which has remained extremely high. Health workers are killed, hospital facilities destroyed and ambulances obstructed, and the entire public health systems collapse (Mukkamala & Beck, 2016).

The civilians in and around the zone are exposed to revivals of epidemics, compounding already existing humanitarian catastrophes as well as causing long-term setbacks in public health development the crucial other area is an overlooked humanitarian challenge of the plight of missing persons and their families (Doozy et al., 2016. Whether the person is uncounted for after an attack, abducted, or as a result of displacement or their body was buried in haste, their families are left waiting. It remains an open wound, which can last a lifetime.

The principles of neutrality and impartiality of humanitarian action have become a myth, a dead concept emptied of its contents due to the reality of modern asymmetrical conflicts. The conflict poses a challenge to neutrality and impartiality concerning agents of humanitarian actions and in contrast to the various problems faced by humanitarian agencies. On the other hand as well as viewing these three major areas I would like to encourage non-governmental organizations to collaborate with government so as to act as a neutral, independent and impartial intermediary, stand ready to assist States in their efforts to increase the protection of the civilian population in armed conflicts (Doosy et al., 2016).

Barriers faced by the humanitarian organizations during deigning and submitting protection projects to donors

There are several barriers that humanitarian organizations face when designing and submitting protection projects to donors. The main ones are inadequate institutional and legal frameworks, national climate-change policies and strategies are either absent or incomplete, weak technical and financial management capacities and procedures which are either missing or deficient, political instability, bad governance, lack of cooperation across borders and with non-governmental actions, lack of necessary infrastructure (Weissbecker et al., 1019).

Insufficient data availability and expertise, which leads to limitations in data analysis and good-practice project preparation. Dependence on multilateral and bilateral grant funding. Projects relevant that involves high costs, sometimes massive amounts, the benefits of these projects maybe environmental and social rather than financial therefore do not usually appeal to conventional profit-seeking donors (Mukkamala & Beck, 2016).

Evaluation measures progress against project objectives, outcomes, and outputs. When done appropriately, information gathered through monitoring can guide in project revisions as well as confirmation that the aid has reached and helped the targeted group. It also enables decision-makers to gather community feedback and identify emerging challenges and trends (Doosy et al., 2016).

Evaluation of protection projects in comparison to other humanitarian projects

The evaluation process for humanitarian protection projects is much easier because it involves three significant steps. These steps include one, refining your project as you go so that evaluation is part of your regular project activities. Two, evaluate the project at agreed milestones, for example, every year or after significant events ( Mukkamala & Beck, 2016. Three, carry out an initial baseline exercise against which you compare progress at the end of the project. Appears much more comfortable, unlike other humanitarian projects that involve five phases, which include planning, implementation, completion, dissemination, and reporting.

References

Doocy, S., Lyles, E., Hanquart, B., & Woodman, M. (2016). Prevalence, care-seeking, and health service utilization for non-communicable diseases among Syrian refugees and host communities in Lebanon. Conflict and health, 10(1), 21. https://conflictandhealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13031-016-0088-3

Goldschmidt, K. H., & Kumar, S. (2016). Humanitarian operations and crisis/disaster management: A retrospective review of the literature and framework for development. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 20, 1-13. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420916301340

Ilcan, S., & Rygiel, K. (2015). "Resiliency humanitarianism": responsibilizing refugees through humanitarian emergency governance in the camp. International Political Sociology, 9(4), 333-351. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/ips.12101

Mukkamala, A., & Beck, R. (2016, January). Disaster management and social media use for decision making by humanitarian organizations. In 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 1379-1385). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7427353/

Weissbecker, I., Hanna, F., El Shazly, M., Gao, J., & Ventevogel, P. (2019). Integrative mental health and psychosocial support interventions for refugees in humanitarian crisis settings. In An Uncertain Safety (pp. 117-153). Springer, Cham. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-72914-5_6