Free Paper Sample on Sharing Versus Competition

Introduction

Sharing is delivering of own belongings, property, time, and thoughts for concern and use by other society members (Zakcharchyn & Lyubomudrova). Competition is the positive growth that a person or a group struggles to achieve using any resource and means available (Zakcharchyn & Lyubomudrova). It is worth noting that individuals and organizations offer themselves for the benefit of others when sharing. In competition, individuals struggle either on a personal or organizational level to improve the state of equity. Sharing is an act of care; for example, children will share their toys with others whose parents cannot afford to provide playing kits.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

In contrast, competition is an act of surpassing others in particular achievements or performances. Competition is like an athletic race where individuals run for their growly and achievement. For example, in an international race, a country’s athlete will run to overtake and win other country’s athletes and surprisingly win fellow country athletes. Having this, I believe that a competitive society is better than a sharing one. This is evident in the following ways.

Absence of Competition

The absence of competition in society introduces a relaxed environment where people tend to be comfortable living. Having reluctance in a society is the cause of mistakes, which demands a cost for amendment of future consequences (Zakcharchyn & Lyubomudrova). Through competition, individuals are challenged to live in alert of opportunities and risks within them. By competition, keenness and efforts to get to better status are installed in society (Lütge Christoph). Competition is a milestone in capturing and inducting inventions and new ideas that may seem relevant before they are implemented (Lütge Christoph). Competition classifies and males a uniform way of sharing resources through hard work and struggles to survive.

Individuals who are alert and keep their eyes open of the minor opportunities and ideas that evolve in society have the capability of performing and living better lives. The competition gives room for learning from mistakes and rectifying the challenge of better positioning in society (Gavrilov Doina). Knowing one's weaknesses is crucial in building one's strength because strength is the accentuation core for capable, competitive ideas. Ultimatum labels are defined by the ability to solve weaknesses. In sharing, the inability and weaknesses of thinking and criticality are promoted. A person cannot have a second thought on achieving their needs if they have the chance to meet their needs and living comfortably through sharing (Lütge Christoph). This kind of social activity is a destruction factor and accelerates personal weaknesses from micro to mega.

Creativity

Competition is the pillar of creativity. Evolution in economic, cultural, political, and social aspects depends on how competitive society is. Having a high-level competition in society gives a tremendous change in humanity (Lütge Christoph). Businesses live hood, and personal development needs competitive creativity and not sharing of resources. Sharing resources only require a format of utilization and not a creativity plan for resource buildup (Zakcharchyn & Lyubomudrova). Without competition, society will be in a dormant state where the capability will be wasted and underestimated. A competitive environment offers the whole society equal chances of suffering a setback in search of success. Struggling to have a sure way of channeling personal character is a virtue given by competition, and this defines a route for success and failure management (Gavrilov Doina). A competent society ensures the activeness of people and a good flow of reasoning and activities.

A community that lacks competition has a monotony to live in and, therefore, boring (Zakcharchyn & Lyubomudrova). A budging question concern arises in a competitive society where challenges are created and dealt with. This way, every society member finds a role in bettering the community and having an interactive life. Whether curricular or extracurricular, social activities are competitive and portray an idea of winning and losing (Lütge Christoph). For example, sports and gaming are extracurricular activities where there are winners and losers, the same in school; there is the competition of scope and performance where there are better students than others. In both cases, the aim is competition definition and categorization of society members. This categorization is essential for the transition from childhood t adulthood.

Perseverance

Every coopetition in society creates and promotes perseverance. With every look of a person's life, every competitive social member works hard to catch up and move along with other successful members. This is the key to perseverance (Gavrilov Doina). It is either you struggle or be left behind in development and social accommodation in society. Giving up is not a choice in a competitive society, and n this is the standout for every member who is struggling to fit in any social group or level (Stolz Jörg, et al). The absence of competition has a direct impact on what extent society can stretch to better the living. A sharing society is a reluctant community, but a competitive one has the token to move beyond any triggered vacancy value (Lütge Christoph).

Through competition, long-term planning is initiated by any society, organization, group, or society. In the quest for success, planning is an obligation that is preceded by perseverance. Setting goals and determining the requirements for achievement is the finishing line in life and should be drawn before and in the process of the competition race (Gavrilov Doina). What matters most is how we as a community and particularly every individual element reaches this end line; the factors and process involved is exclusive competition. Therefore, having high competition is the best structure to build a plan. The loser in a competition is those who have weak plans or even lac objectives in life; in short, the elements that do not compete.

Business Competition

Unlike sharing, competition fosters inro every context of humanity. In business, competition brings a better image of oneself; for example, through competition, low-cost manufacturing systems are invented, and in the same way, businesses tend to raise profit (Zakcharchyn & Lyubomudrova). Though this comes at a cost, manual employees are cut off from the system; it creates a chance for professional employment and minimization of working accidents (Stolz Jörg, et al). The quality of goods and services in society also improves through quality branding and competitive advertisement. In such a business venture scenario, the consumer benefits from having a range of variety to choose from. In the same token, micro competition between firms and macro competition between countries is a scale of improving the economy and living standards (Stolz Jörg, et al). A company will struggle to maintain its customers in a free society market, but others will try and fetch the customers; this is where society gets best offers and quality from the firms.

In a competitive society, one is assured of attaining the basic need, food, shelter, and clothing. It is through the policies of competition that society ensures rights and equity are observed. Social issues like discrimination, racism, and ethical confrontations are eliminated in society through competition. Sharing is a promoter of discrimination against gender, ethnic groups, and relative associations. The ethics of competition also have a capable political and cultural environment in society (Stolz Jörg, et al). Every cultural norm applicable in any sector is respected and promoted as a way of performance. Sharing can ve mutual, but in most cases, there is a tendency of favor. For example, a person will share food with their relatives and leave out other persons who may need the same food (Stolz Jörg, et al).

Sharing is fair but is a prompt of violence. Those with mush ti share will boast about how they sustain the society, which leaves a cohesion gap in problems. In the same tokens, competition creates a respected state between the resource owners and competitive factors. Every acquired resource, product, or success is out of a personal cost, and no one can claim to be the root of another person's success (Stolz Jörg, et al).

Conclusion

Indeed, competitive society is far much better than a sharing society. A system of working is better than a system of issuing. Competitive nature has full exposure of society to the whole world. Poverty remains in the society that shares, but it is eliminated through competition. Sharing is a virtue, but it is better to emerge in earning rather than benefiting from aids. The world has all resources necessary to sustain every element of society. Competition and sharing are obsolete norms in society and depend on resources, but competition is a magnification platform of these resources while sharing is a depletion strategy of resources. A society that shares are blind to these utilities and can never divisively protect and visualize resources. Competition diverges to creation, and creation leads to further effort.

Works Cited

Gavrilov, Doina. "Competition Policy and Its Impact on Society." REVISTA UNIVERSITARA DE SOCIOLOGIE 15.1 (2019): 202-214.

Lütge, Christoph. The Ethics of Competition: How a Competitive Society is Good for All. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019.

Stolz, Jörg, et al. (Un) believing in modern society: religion, spirituality, and religious-secular competition. Routledge, 2016.

Zakcharchyn, G., and N. Lyubomudrova. "Social-culturological aspects of competition." Economics, Entrepreneurship, Management 6.1 (2019): 30-35.