|Type of paper:||Essay|
|Categories:||Slavery Martin Luther King American history|
Question 1: Comparison of Racial Conflicts in South and West
The freedom of the slaves was achieved in 19th century in the United States of America. The freedom gesture accorded the slaves a chance to move from the South to the West. However, some people chose to remain in the South where their fate can be ranked to intently severe than at the West (Schaefer, 2008). The critical similarities on racial conflicts in both regions are the fact that the blacks were suffering from stigmatization on the identity of free slaves. The African Americans thus had an intense zeal for full citizenship, the pursuit of education and the establishment of economic independence. Another similarity is the identity that all the races at the West and South were all not created equal.
At the South, through the intervention of some of the leaders the blacks were able to pursue the interests at the condition of noninterference with the white people. However, on the other hand, at the West, the African Americans became cowboys, developed black communities, developed ranches while others worked in the mines. It is evident that the West had no interest in what the native Americans had to do with land grabbing. The West, therefore, contended with the native Americans (Schaefer, 2008). However, for the South, the setting was based on intense racism against the blacks.
At the South slavery was rampant, and the blacks were perceived as less human beings. Although the immigrants mainly developed the South, the idea was ignored after some majority immigrants had moved to the West. The whites were the majority population in the South although they were from diverse heritages. The native Americans were sent off from their lands.
Question 2: Advantages and Disadvantages of Progressiveness
The orientation of progressiveness is anchored on the idea of the creation of an equitable society where the target is to eliminate the extreme levels of poverty and suffering among the minority in the community. The advantages of the reform system are based on the significant intention of the program while the disadvantages are based on the consequences. The underlying merits of the reform strategy on progressiveness are the central focus on political corruption (Kudcryz & Bloomsbury, 2012). The welfare of the minority was thus better looked out for, and the level of government efficiency was achieved. It is through the era that antitrust policies and regulated industries were executed. Most importantly, there was a significant need for the election of the senator so that the majority interests would be served. Federal income taxation was introduced to promote equity between the minority and the superiors in the society (Kudcryz & Bloomsbury, 2012).
Women during the team were accorded the chance to set demands on the problems of women suffrage, education, and prohibitions. During the time Jane Addams who served as the women leaders played an active role in the fight for the empowerment of women in the society. The intentions of the program sounded genuine and valuable. However, the consequences of the leadership depict otherwise.
The fundamental shortcomings of the system include the promotion of discrimination, especially racial discrepancy. For example, the African Americans were accorded services and facilities of lower quality than the whites. For instance, in public funding, the African American schools received less funding than the white schools. Segregation was thus a tremendous inclusive part of the society (Kudcryz & Bloomsbury, 2012). Other crucial demerits include that progressive era was characterized loose and contradictory goals which inhibited the efforts of the reformers substantially. For instance Roosevelt a national leader advocated for federal regulation in the regulation of the big businesses while Wilson, on the other hand, promoted free competition.
Question 3: Key Intentions for the Allied Powers
The Allied Powers is a unit of three major unions, the United States, the Soviet Union, and Great Britain. The heads of the group include the President of the United States Roosevelt, the Prime minister of the Great Britain Churchill and the leader of the Soviet Union. The critical central intention of the Allied Powers was to overcome or defeat Germany. The major dilemma of the unit was the development of the best strategy to achieve the defeat against the group. The three units all developed diverse ideas where the US suggested the France invasion through the English Channel, Churchill advocated for indirect attack while the leader of the Soviet Union also developed their unique designs (Rothwell, 2005). The central objective of the nations was to accord protection for their countries against the German nation, and it is the reason it was a priority for the three units the Soviet Union, US and Britain. The expansionist idea of Adolf Hitler was among the critical concepts fought in the context.
The second principal aim was to achieve victory against the Japanese. The critical need to wipe out Japan was driven by the fear of the intentions of the nations. The nation together with the Axis countries had the interest to gain more land. The desire was inspired by the need to feel equated regarding equal empires as the allied powers had in the society (Rothwell, 2005). The strategy was thus oriented on more land grabbing to enrich the resources and therefore the Allied Powers had to conjoin efforts to eliminate such possibilities.
The principal objective of the allied powers was thus oriented on the prevention of the Axis from winning. The Allies had no intentions to grab territories or resources from Germany or Japan nations rather the protection of personal interests, and the individual defense was the central objective. The focus was thus to set back the powers of the German countries back to their home countries. For the Axis nations, the intentions of war were objected on the need for grabbing territory while on the other hand, the Allied powers urge was to achieve defense and a status quo (Rothwell, 20015).
Question 4: Use of Civil Disobedience as a Strategy in the Civil Rights Movement
Martin Luther King is legend regularly celebrated in the United States for the legacy inability to fight against racial discrimination using the non-violence strategies. The complex idea of the civil disobedience is best summed in the Letter from Birmingham Jail. The approval of the procedure on civil disobedience still contends on the value of the approach in the civil rights movement (Duatrich & Yalof, 2009). My opinion on refusal to obey the demands and commands of the government is that it is a potent weapon and peaceful strategy to aid in the civil rights movements.
Dr. Martin Luther King is a critical example that aids in the reflection of civil disobedience. The ideas on the strategy were mainly inspired by non-Christian beliefs, for instance, Gandhi's ideas which accorded reinforcement on the ability to achieve success (Dautrich & Yalof, 2009). The first opportunity for Martin Luther King to depict the civil disobedience was through agreeing to become the leader of the Montgomery Bus Boycott. Being the leader, he influenced the blacks to boycott the city buses to help offer equal chances in the buses rather than the discriminative positioning in the coaches.
Through the emulation of the Gandhi's strategy, Martin Luther King was able to achieve a transition and effectuated the changes in government through the use of civil disobedience. The approach was the primary drive for the fight against racial discrimination in the United States of America through the non -violent refusal to obey the commands of the government. The primary challenge of the strategy is the fact that although in the beginning, the intentions may be non-violent it in many cases tends to be violent due to the excessive use of government to intrigue conformity (Dautrich & Yalof, 2009). It is the reason the speeches of Martin Luther King caused him trouble which extended to his family and further led to his assassinations.
The act of civil disobedience is a crucial call for the government to address the underlying concerns of the citizens. The challenge of the strategy is the excessive actions that the government may take. However, if people remained grounded on non- violent strategies and depicted bravery in their efforts, it is no doubt a successful strategy in the civil rights movement. The success in the development of equity rights for the blacks and the transition on the racial discrimination in the United States of America is proving that the strategy is resourceful. However, the people undertaking the procedure should be well informed of the underlying consequences.
Dautrich, K., & Yalof, D. A. (2009). American Government: Historical, popular, and global perspectives. Australia: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Kudrycz, W., & Bloomsbury Publishing. (2012). The historical present: Medievalism and modernity. London [etc.: Bloomsbury Academic.
Rothwell, V. (2005). War aims in the Second World War: The war aims of the major belligerents, 1939-45. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press.
Schaefer, R. T. (2008). Encyclopedia of race, ethnicity, and society. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
Cite this page
American History Essay Sample. (2022, Mar 18). Retrieved from https://speedypaper.com/essays/american-history-essay-sample
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the SpeedyPaper website, please click below to request its removal:
- Free Essay on Intercultural Communication Barriers and Solutions Between Nigeria and China
- History of Republicanism - Free Essay Example
- Essay Example: Political Changes in Texas during the Reconstruction
- Violence Intervention Program, Essay Sample
- Free Essay Sample on US Immigration Policies
- Essay Example on Structured Gender Inequality
- Free Essay Sample about Technology and Loneliness