Paper Example. Paradigmatic Relations of the Word 'Subtle'

The existence of paradigmatic relations is primarily found in the same share and class of a paradigm, meaning a set of different examples having a sequential pattern. There are different kinds of paradigmatic relations, one of them being the morphological paradigm. Existing verbs present in a particular paradigm appear to be shared except on the tenses. Few existing paradigmatic relationships primarily have maximum attention, specifically from lexical semantics (Im Walde & Koper, 2013). The presence of synonyms is categorized as a vital mode whereby commonness is effectively achieved among verbs. The main aim of the paper, therefore, is to make a proper investigation of the frequency and nature of the existence of synonyms in English. It will also basically put the focus on the ordering and classification means of words through the presence of a substitutability test.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

However, firstly we will explore the concern of synonyms through the use of the word 'bring' and compare it up to three same presents in a thesaurus. 'Bring' is a verb that is usually applied to effectively ensure that there are different actions taking place, either going with someone or taking someone to a specified location (Im Walde & Koper, 2013). Its synonyms include escort, guide, and also conduct. In the thesaurus comparison phase of the verb bring is that other words may be applied to depict the appropriate meaning of it. These words include; bring around, which is present in the Thesaurus, and it is referred to as an alternative form of bringing. Secondly, there is the presence of transport which means to carry goods and lastly is take-along. Through comparison means of the above thesaurus words in the verb bring, it is clear that there is the existence of a paradigmatic relationship in it.

According to the selection of the above thesaurus words, it is clear that the words seem synonymous since they seem to have a similar meaning in their operation. They all appear to adequately mean the same thing, specifically when applied in a sentence. Therefore instead of repeating the same thing in a specific phrase or since, individuals should effectively use relevant synonymous words to depict the expected meaning of such sentence or phrase (Sheng & Marian, 2006). Substitutability test, at this point, will effectively play a vital role in adequately depicting the different meanings of the thesaurus words possible. Therefore, these words can be effectively substituted in the verb bring to ultimately provide different meanings in a sentence. Let's consider the sentence below that will strictly offer with the appropriate usage of the verb "bring" plus ensure an inclusion of the thesaurus words of it to make a possible conclusion that the terms are synonymous quickly.

Sentences

• Bring around- He fainted, so we splashed old water on his face to bring him around.
• Transport- They hired a moving company to transport their belongings to their home.
• Take along- They knew they'd have to move fast and carry the wounded men back, so they didn't want to take along any more weight than necessary.

The above sentences clearly show that the thesaurus comparisons of the term "bring" strictly show synonymous existence of it. Its importance, therefore, is to ensure that repletion means one word is not present adequately. Moreover, let's consider a sentence having the verb "bring" to show the substitutability test measure in a sentence effectively. "They won't bring anything to eat," strictly indicates that if the conviction were to be replaced with the thesaurus outcomes of it, it would purely portray another meaning in it (Loo, 2018). Therefore, as a focused learner, one needs to strictly ensure that choices of specific synonyms of a given the word are made keenly, strictly to avoid confusion while reading such a sentence. Some synonyms, while fixed within a particular sentence, do not provide the intended meanings resulting in a misunderstanding of the sentences. When making choices of the appropriate synonyms to apply a mode of paradigmatic relation, an individual's perception should be highly considered. Therefore choices of words should also put a considerate outcome of the sentences to avoid confusion.

In definitions of synonyms, it is clear that all words applied in a specified sentence should effectively produce similar meanings. This is to strictly ensure that the intention of the writer to pass certain information is adequately achieved (Loo, 2018). Therefore according to the above sentences, it is clear that, while incorporating some words in a sentence, there is a need to, first of all, reread it to avoid altering its meaning strictly. Some words, therefore, even though they may appear in the synonym list, do not correctly fit in some sentences. It is clear that in his work, Thesaurus proposed the above words as synonyms strictly because they had a close meaning with the verb 'bring".

On the contrary, it is clear that according to thesaurus words, they may strictly lead to complex outcomes to different sentences intending to apply the actual synonymous concepts of the verb. Hence at some point, there is no need to effectively put maximum focus on the thesaurus words on different verbs. Thus one should always be keen while making the operation of choosing the best-fit words in some sentences. One should always put in mind that the choices of synonyms still require focus and concentration to produce the actual meaning.

References

Im Walde, S. S., & Koper, M. (2013). Pattern-based distinction of paradigmatic relations for German nouns, verbs, adjectives. In Language Processing and Knowledge in the Web (pp. 184-198). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-40722-2_19

Loo, K., Jarvikivi, J., Tomaschek, F., Tucker, B. V., & Baayen, R. H. (2018). Production of Estonian case-inflected nouns shows whole-word frequency and paradigmatic effects. Morphology, 28(1), 71-97. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11525-017-9318-7

Sheng, L., McGregor, K. K., & Marian, V. (2006). Lexical-semantic organization in bilingual children: Evidence from a repeated word association task. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. Retrieved from https://pubs.asha.org/doi/full/10.1044/1092-4388%282006/041%29