Type of paper: | Essay |
Categories: | Analysis Mathematics |
Pages: | 3 |
Wordcount: | 597 words |
Validity: An argument is said to be valid if the truth values for ALL premises are TRUE for EVERY true truth value of the conclusions, that is, the truth values of the conclusion are true for every true premise.
SECTION I: General Concepts
1. False (F)
2. False (F)
3. True (T)
4. True (T)
5. True (T)
SECTION II: Truth Tables
~ (Negation/ Not) used to negate statements.
V (Disjunction/ Or) connects statements p and q to form compound propositions that are false only if both p and q are false.
(Material implication/ If…then ) used to form statements p and q which are conditional such that the conditional statement (s) is false only when q is false and p true.
(Biconditional connective/ If and only if) which logically connects two statements p and q asserting p iff q with q as a consequent and the antecedent being p.
(Conjunction/ And) which connects statements p and q forming compound propositions such that the propositions are true if and only if p and q are both true.
a) ~A ⊃ (B ∨ A) / B ⊃ A / A // ~A ⊃ B
A |
B |
~A |
B ∨ A |
~A ⊃ (B ∨ A) |
B ⊃ A |
~A ⊃ B |
T |
T |
F |
T |
T |
T |
T |
T |
F |
F |
T |
T |
T |
T |
F |
T |
T |
T |
F |
F |
F |
F |
F |
T |
F |
F |
T |
F |
b) The argument ~A ⊃ (B ∨ A) / B ⊃ A / A // ~A ⊃ B is valid since ~A ⊃ B has truth values that are true in EVERY case where ALL of the truth values of A are true.
SECTION III: Rules of Replacement
1. Duplication 4. Equivalence 7. Commutativity 10.Implication
2. Negation 5. Simplification 8. Conjunction
3. Dilemma 6. Disjunction Introduction 9. Conditional Exchange
SECTION III: Proofs using Rules of Replacement
1.
1.) (1) (~M ⊃ P)(~N ⊃ Q)
2) ~(MN) /∴ P ∨ Q
(3) ~M ∨ ~N 2 Dem
(4) P ∨ Q 2 Imp
2. 2.) (1) R ⊃ ~B
(2) D ∨ R
(3) B /∴ D
(4) ~~B 3DN
(5) ~R 1,2 MT
(6) R ∨ D 2Com
(7) D 2,6DI
3.) (1) ~ ~ ~(O ∨ M)
(2) ~S /∴ ~M
(3) ~(O ∨ M) 1DN
(4) ~O~M 3DeM
(5) ~M~O 4 Com
(6) ~M 2-5 IMP
4.) (1) ~(~E~N) ⊃ T
(2) G ⊃ (N ∨ E) /∴ G ⊃ T
(3) (~~E ∨ ~~N) ⊃ T 1DeM
(4) (E ∨ ~~N) ⊃ T 3DN
(5) (E ∨ N) ⊃ T 4DN
(6) (N ∨ E) ⊃ T 5Com
(7) G ⊃ T 2IMP
SECTION IV: Proofs
a.) 1. M ⊃ (U ⊃ H)
2. (H ∨ ~U) ⊃ F / M ⊃ F
3. H ∨ ~U 2IMP
4. F 2MP
5. H 3SIMP
6. ~U 3SIMP
7. M 1 SIMP
8. M ⊃F
b.) 1. ~H ⊃ B
2. ~H ⊃ D
3. ~(B • D) / H
4. B • D 3IMP
5. B 4SIMP
6. D 4SIMP
7. ~H 1,5MP
8. ~ ~H 7DN
9. H
Cite this page
Logic Final Exam Solutions. (2018, Jan 31). Retrieved from https://speedypaper.com/essays/logic-final-exam-solutions
Request Removal
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the SpeedyPaper website, please click below to request its removal:
- Free Essay on Race and Racism: Holy Wars and Islamophobia in the Past and Present
- Essay Sample Analyzing Dr. King's Letter from Birmingham Jail
- Different Perspectives on the Life and Work of Jesus, Essay Sample
- Essay Sample on the Roles of a School Principal
- Taxes, Economy & Development: A Guide for Success
- Log in | HYPERLINK "https://www.emeraldinsight.com/action/registration?redirectUri=%2Fdoi%2Fabs%2F10.1108%2FJMTM-03-2018-0099" Register
- Siemens' Case Study Paper Example
Popular categories