Essay Sample on The Intelligent Designer: Unraveling the Debate Between Science and Religion

The argument between science and religion over the existence of an intelligent designer often leads to non-useful wrangles. We always have personal and emotional arguments about whether God exists or not. All courtesy is neglected when offered with rebellious points of view, and chances for civil addresses are lost. Significant research is being carried out, on whether an intelligent designer exists or not. Real-life processes have failed to explain how inorganic chemicals could self-assemble into a living cell. According to Michael Delton, directionless processes turned lifeless chemicals into the unusual intricacy of living organisms (Strobel, 2004, 369). Fossil records have not established the central claims of Darwinian evolutions.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

Science reveals about life, the world, and the universe; however, it has not stated why the universe exists nor what led to its establishment in the Big Bang. Biological evolution does not prove how unconventional eukaryotic cells, which are the highly designed building blocks of advanced living organisms, could emerge from modest creatures (Strobel, 2004, 370). It also does not explain how cognizance developed in living organisms.

Evolution is a complete detail as long as it is demarcated as the micro-evolutionary distinctions we see in faunas and floras. Indisputably, there is a considerable range of change and diversification that has occurred over time. However, there is not enough proof to derive a fundamental conclusion that wide-range, of macro-evolutionary changes have taken place (Strobel, 2004, 357). The mechanisms triggered by macroevolution cannot be induced to interpret the occurrence of macroevolution. Naturalism has no reliable explanation of the universe established. This letdown of naturalistic and Darwinist perceptions contributed to considering the alternative premise that both the universe and the life it comprises are due to an intelligent designer.

Numerous principles of physical surroundings, for example, energy conservation, trail inevitably from the experiential symmetries of the cosmos. There is a reason why the principles of physics cannot have emerged from the universe itself. Cosmologists are not aware that the world had a beginning. Some astrophysical representations show that the universe has had an infinite series of expansion and contraction. But other cosmologists claim that inflation must have had a starting point which could have been nonentity. This hypothetical possibility was proof that God was not useful in creation. However, some scientists noted that the natural state of affairs is something rather than nothing. A void universe would require paranormal involvement, not a full one. This finale seems to be lacking considerations. Science experts do not entirely understand the quantum universe, and their postulates about creation are mere guesses in this sense. There is a need to learn and understand physics's ultimate principles before we can prove they are inevitable. Assuming the theory for quantum creation is accurate, this will sound like Leibniz's definition of God as an essential being with its aim for subsistence in itself. Instead of developing proof of God's existence, science will extend our description of divinity.

Scientists still have never understood why the universe was made for the emergence of life. There is no scientific solution for this. The deeper we indulge in physics's secrecy, the more the universe seems to be complicated and extremely complex. It would be hard to explain why even the most minuscule particles of matter are incredibly intricate. This reveals a massive, hidden intelligence or structure plan for even the most simple-looking constituent of nature. The state of affairs becomes even more overwhelming as we develop our view of the whole universe.

Several years ago, a gargantuan eruption of energy whose nature and origin are not known to us and not in the least comprehended by science, commenced the development of the cosmos. Suddenly the God particle, the Higgs boson, was revealed inside CERN's great particle accelerator. The large Hadron collider emerged and incredibly led to the universe having its mass. The mass was made up of elementary particles, the quarks, and the electrons whose weightiness and electrical charges had to drop within incalculable constricted bounds for what would occur next. All the quarks abruptly merged in threes to establish protons and neutrons. Their electrical charges are set accurately to the specific level needed to draw and seize the electrons, which then start to encircle nuclei constituted of protons and neutrons. All the weights, charges, and forces of attraction in the cosmos had to be in specifically required amounts to develop past lightweight atoms (Moreland, 2010). Larger atoms would then be established in nuclear fires in the stars giving out carbon, iron, nitrogen, oxygen, and other useful life elements. Eventually, the highly complex double-helix molecule, the life proliferating DNA, would emerge. From this, a troubling question is raised as to why everything required in order for life to emerge was developed. Without underlying outside power to orchestrate the exact turn of elementary particles needed to create all necessities of life, this could not be possible.

Several scientists have resolved that the principles of chemistry and physics cannot elucidate the experience of cognizance. The soul comprises the consciousness and enlivens our body. Some of the research works prove that you can get something from nothing. If everything emerged with the intelligent designer's mind, the explanation about the origin of the consciousness would have been resolved (Moreland, 2010).

The proof about intelligent designers seems believable, convincing, and fascinating. The creator is intellectual and is progressing to be part of the creation even after the Big Bang. The intelligent designer was amazingly precise in generating a suitable habitat for the living being created. This fascinating creation implies that intelligent designers' minds are concerned about the creatures. Biochemistry and biological data confirm the designer's activity implies extreme creativity (Moreland, 2010). Proof of consciousness shows that the creator is coherent; it reveals the basis for comprehending that the intelligent designer is all-pervading. This evidence also affirms the credibility of life after death.

Quarks are credible in confirming direct physical proof. No human being has ever and will ever see a quark (Strobel, 2004, 370). Similarly, the intelligent designer is unseen. However, there are many senses derived from the creator that influence knowledge and familiarity; the plan of the physical universe, the multifaceted character of realism, the worldwide knowledge of worship and hopefulness, and the occurrence of Jesus. The comparable thought procedures are attributed to both circumstances.

The argument between science and religion over the existence of an intelligent designer often leads to non-useful wrangles. We always have personal and emotional arguments about whether God exists or not. Thus far, real-life processes have failed to explain how inorganic chemicals could self-assemble into a living cell. Science and religion are both paths to understanding the world better. They reveal the marvel of life and the endless universe surrounding the living being. The design of the cosmos and the human body, including the organs and cells, proves that the sovereignty that established the universe must be extremely intelligent.

References

Moreland, J. P. (2010). Consciousness and the existence of God: A theistic argument. Routledge.

Strobel, L. (2004). The case for a Creator: A journalist investigates scientific evidence that points toward God. Zondervan.