The European Union draws its origin from two communities. These are the European Coal and Steel Community of 1951 and the European Economic Community of 1958 (O'Brennan, 2006). These two were formed by the unions six founding countries. They include Germany, France, Italy, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands (Melnikas, 2015). In the past years, the communities, as well as its successors have grown substantially in size (Hursoy, 2010). This has been brought about by the accession of new member states and the addition of policies in needy areas (Wolff, 2012). The European Union established its name under the Maastricht Treaty of 1993 when European citizenship was also introduced (Kaunert, Leonard, & Occhipinti, 2013). The latest addition to its list of major treaties is the Treaty of Lisbon that was signed in 2009.
The EU has built up a role in peripheral relations and security. This has been done through the enforcement of foreign and national security policy (Lavallee, 2011). It has thereby been able to sustain permanent diplomatic relations through other world powers such as the G8, the G-20, and the United Nations (Wolff, 2012). It is the affiliations that have made many people brand it the current and potential superpower. This is, however, not what it aims for. It alternatively persists in pursuing its goal of ensuring the European (Partizek, 2012) Security and Defense Policy is operational and the best. Improving the unions military capacity has long been moderate (Kostovicova, 2014). On the other hand, organizational and procedural achievements have essentially become key.
Slow military advancement in the union has been harbored by the lack of answers in regards to the questions of what the exact needs of the union in the defense sector are. European Unions access to NATO assets was restricted until 2002 when diplomatic relations between the two were improved (Wolff, S). In the same year, however, the unions forces could not be deployed to manage crisis works. It was only until 1 January when EU made a breakthrough in its serving the civilians docket (Kienzle, 2014). It made outstanding progress with the launch of a police mission in Bosnia and Herzegovina (Mocanu, 2013). Nevertheless, prospects of an increase in military expenditure are still slim. Due to this, other options, both national and multinational are being pursued to address the problem of capital shortfalls.
The creation of the European Capabilities Plan in May 2003, for example, has proven to be of assistance (Jones & Clark, 2013). It has given a boost to flexibility and coordination in member states. Another prominent idea that has been receiving lots of approval is the one involving establishing an intergovernmental defense system capability that may lead to the generation of a secure procurement program. This plan has received support from states even in the G-20 such as France, Germany, and the UK (Demirag, 2014). If this plan prospers, it would be easy for the union to gain freedom from the troublesome ban on using its financial reserves for defense principles (Keukeleire & Raube, 2013).
As of 2002, the major obstacles involving the launch of an operational first emergency management system had been trounced (Papagianni, 2013). In May 2004, it also underwent challenges involving weak political capacities, which are a major problem to date (Gebhard, 2013). This can however not be compared to its current problems and its next major enlargement. These confronts will need cautious examination and proper decisions where the Foreign and National Security Policy and the ESDP are involved (Grabbe, 2014). This can only be successful if executed during the start to and after completion of enlargement.
Demirag, Y. (2014). The European Union's Black Sea Policy: In Light Of Recent Developments. Journal Of Black Sea Studies, (41), 76-86.
Gebhard, C. (2013). Soft Competition: Finland, Sweden and the Northern Dimension of the European Union. Scandinavian Political Studies, 36(4), 365-390.
Grabbe, H. (2014). Six Lessons of Enlargement Ten Years On: The EU's Transformative Power in Retrospect and Prospect. Journal Of Common Market Studies, 5240-56.
Hursoy, S. (2010). The European Union Foreign and Security Actions and the Western Balkans. Alternatives: Turkish Journal Of International Relations, 9(1), 92-111.
Jones, A., & Clark, J. (2013). Practicing Geographical Uniqueness: The Geopolitics of Prenegotiation and Icelandic Accession to the European Union. Annals Of The Association Of American Geographers, 103(6), 1437-1451.
Kaunert, C., Leonard, S., & Occhipinti, J. D. (2013). Agency Governance in the European Union's Area of Freedom, Security and Justice. Perspectives On European Politics & Society, 14(3), 273-284.
Keukeleire, S., & Raube, K. (2013). The securitydevelopment nexus and securitization in the EU's policies towards developing countries. Cambridge Review Of International Affairs, 26(3), 556-572.
Kienzle, B. (2014). The New Face of EU Security Policies? Analysing the Normative Patterns of EU Non-Proliferation Policies in the Southern Mediterranean. Mediterranean Politics, 19(1), 40-58.
Kostovicova, D. (2014). When Enlargement Meets Common Foreign and Security Policy: Serbia's Europeanisation, Visa Liberalisation and the Kosovo Policy. Europe-Asia Studies, 66(1), 67-87.
Lavallee, C. (2011). The European Commission's Position in the Field of Security and Defence: An Unconventional Actor at a Meeting Point. Perspectives On European Politics & Society, 12(4), 371-389.
Melnikas, B. (2015). Innovation Strategies For The European Union. Public Administration (16484541), 1/2(45/46), 67-77.
Mocanu, O. M. (2013). Some considerations on the intergovernmental dimension of the European Neighbourhood Policy. Eastern Journal Of European Studies, 4(2), 37-49.
O'Brennan, J. (2006). Bringing Geopolitics Back In: Exploring the Security Dimension of the 2004 Eastern Enlargement of the European Union. Cambridge Review Of International Affairs, 19(1), 155-169.
Papagianni, G. (2013). Forging an External EU Migration Policy: From Externalisation of Border Management to a Comprehensive Policy?. European Journal Of Migration & Law, 15(3), 283-299.
Partizek, M. (2012). After the Enlargement: Trends and Threats in the European Union Decision-Making. Perspectives: Central European Review Of International Affairs, 20(1), 33-57.
Wolff, S. (2012). The Mediterranean dimension of the European Union's internal security. Houndsmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cite this page
Free Essay: The Security Dimensions of European Union Enlargement. (2019, Jun 14). Retrieved from https://speedypaper.com/essays/the-security-dimensions-of-european-union-enlargement
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the SpeedyPaper website, please click below to request its removal:
- Essay Sample on Organizing and Tracking Data
- Free Essay on the Measures of Scale: Correlation and Regression
- Free Essay Example on Congressional Ethics
- Gravity Begins with Aristotle and Ends with Einstein, Free Essay
- Essay Example for Free: Variation and Language by Miriam Merhoff
- Free Essay on Sendai Mediatheque by Toyo Ito
- Essay Example on Homeland Security: Preventing and Protecting Against Terrorist Attacks