Free Essay: Singlehood in Gay Community

Published: 2023-10-29
Free Essay: Singlehood in Gay Community
Type of paper:  Essay
Categories:  Philosophy Relationship God Community
Pages: 7
Wordcount: 1716 words
15 min read

When one is philosophical, he or she approaches a tough situation in a level-headed way. Philosophy is the way of thinking about the world, and society and asking questions about the connections between human thought and the nature of the universe. Philosophy helps us understand the world through logic and sound reasoning. It performs the same thing science does for us. It has produced some essential thoughts on sociology, mathematics, science, and literature through reflection and does not rely on experiments.

Trust banner

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Additionally, it is the right way of analyzing arguments that are useful in a variety of situations in the real world; education, Christianity, and many others. Greek philosophy is all about the love of knowledge and wisdom. This essay will discuss the philosophical concepts of cases of everyday life and understand common experiences from a philosophical perspective. This will be seen in the review of Soloveitchik’s typology of human nature in The Lonely Man of Faith. Secondly, this paper discusses how I understand the topic of Adam I and Adam II's perspective. Finally, the article will show a comparison to Soloveitchik’s views with Bertrand Russell's.

In the book The Lonely Man of Faith (Soloveitchik,1965), Soloveitchik is frustrated as a man of faith in the modern world. These frustrations were faced by people who believed in the ancient belief that was being challenged by modernity's technological genius. Soloveitchik's primary conflict was based on loneliness despite having many friends and the struggle to be human. He analyzes the story of creation as per the first book of the Bible, the book of Genesis. In the first book, Adam I is to dominate the world while in the second Adam II is in a close relationship with God. Soloveitchik’s essay is based on the exploration of the nature of religious life and the interpretation of the book of Genesis chapters 1 and 2.

On the other hand, Soloveitchik’s theological writings are characterized by high sensitivity to the problematics of human existence (Wiliam, 2016). Man is driven by two conflicts: the desire to dominate the world and hope to fulfill his needs by being submissive to God. The human craves for faith to manage and control the environment. They seek both creative engagements with the world and closeness with God. Soloveitchik explains the lifelong struggle of a person to navigate between the spiritual, the material, the religious, and the scientific (Wiliam, 2016). This shows the human condition and the desire to control the environment, and this involves faith, which cannot be understood by humans.

However, considering Soloveitchik's life, he stood out as a man of faith and was submissive to God. “I am lonely because, in my humble, inadequate way, I am a man of faith for whom to be meant to believe. Apparently, in this role as a man of faith, I must experience a sense of loneliness, which is of a compound nature” (Soloveitchik,1995). Soloveitchik's loneliness was a result of the outcome of his experience of faith. This suggesting that a man can genuinely connect to God when alone, a silent place with no destruction (Wiliam, 2016). This functioned for him as he furthered his connection to God. The state of loneliness is when the human being develops a personal relationship with God and finds fulfillment in his capacity as portrayed by Adam II.

Furthermore, loneliness is necessary also to archive a person’s creativity and a unique style of expression and interaction. In Soloveitchik, word "to be" means to be the only one and different and consequently lonely. Loneliness enables us to live our lives by remaining true while interacting and humbly relying on God as a source of creativity (Wiliam, 2016). Also, Soloveitchik enables us to seek solace with God and find our unique creativity to fulfill the Godly mandate of conquering nature.

On the other hand, on the theory of Adam I and Adam II, Soloveitchik talks of two accounts of creation representing the two opposing sides of nature (Rynhold, 2018). Adam 1 represents the practical and discernible qualities: a self- display of use, what we call the resume virtues while Adam II describes the internal strengths which are not easy to observe from the outside, the quiet character, and morality that slowly develops over time (Rynhold, 2018). Adam II humility is in his willingness to suppress the needs and desires of the self for the sake of the community.

Also, while Adam I wanted to conquer the world, Adam II wants to obey the calling to serve the world. Adam I is interested in how things work, while Adam II is interested in why things exist. In real life, most of us need the resume virtues of Adam I to become employed. Society emphasizes the cultural shifts of Adam I attributes of pride and self-esteem, which positively affect correcting social injustice. This encourages members of the community to raise their sights and aspirations. However, it is Adam II in each of us that leads to others' service (Shartz, 2016). In conclusion, we do not need to replace the virtues of Adam I and Adam II; instead, our role is to bring the resume virtues of Adam I and the eulogy virtues of Adam II into a healthier balance.

Adam I wants to conquer the world while Adam II wants to be good and know why things exist. In today's world, we need to deepen our Adam II to experience new emotions and joy than we could ever imagine (Wiliam, 2016). Concerning pleasure, people with deep characters have unconditional love, while concerning intellect, they have a philosophy about how life is. In their action, they have commitments to projects that cannot be completed in a lifetime.

However, the way we choose to deal with stress, sadness, and pain is the determinant of our character. By committing ourselves to suffer, we are set free while making ourselves vulnerable; we harden our inner nature. People should heighten their discomfort and figure out what makes them uncomfortable (Shartz, 2016). Also, they should know why they are uncomfortable and finally address that discomfort and overcome it.

According to Russell’s definition of philosophy, he argues that philosophy is the science of the possible. He talks of a philosophical applying to everything that exists or may exist, and there is no such thing as the universe. He considers philosophy propositions to be general and that they may be asserted of an individual situation, such as propositions of logic. He assumes that properties belong to a particular thing, not properties belonging to a whole thing collectively, and it belongs to something that may exist. Soloveitchik's view on philosophy is based on the early twentieth century's science as the only approach to the world that offers knowledge. Furthermore, he considers the creation theories to express his idea of philosophy.

According to Soloveitchik typology of human nature, loneliness is a significant aspect in everyone to have personal communication with God. Besides, he also argues that being alone enables us to find our fulfillment and figure out our inner core. Using the two theories of Adam I and Adam II, he explains their different ideas and what they wanted. Adam, I wanted to conquer the world, while Adam II was into knowing how things work and wanted to be close to God to further his connection (Wiliam, 2016). Loneliness enables us to live our lives most profoundly by reaming ourselves even while interacting as per the Soloveitchik philosophy. It allows us to seek the solace of God and find the creativity to conquer nature, and every person has a unique way of experiencing loneliness.

Furthermore, in the world, today, man is driven by the desire to dominate the world and fulfill his needs, and this requires being close to God. On the other hand, faith is an essential requirement for those who seek creative and inspired engagement with the world (Rynhold, 2018). A close reading of The Lone of Faith, the author, is a man between two different human conditions. He is a man of faith and has faith in God as he engages with the modern world. He experiences a sense of loneliness as a result of society's coming to terms with the notion of faith. A man can come to his right reasons in a silent place with no destruction.

According to the analysis of the biblical accounts, the major focus is on the confrontation. Soloveitchik describes philosophy based on three levels of a human being. At first human beings are described as natural non-confronted human beings who emerged with the general order of things (Shartz, 2016). They are identified as pleasure-seekers who are not aware of their unique status. At the second level, human beings confront their environment as the subject; they are independent of nature, enabling them to receive a divine imperative; thus, they can rule their domain with their creativity. On the third person, Soloveitchik describes it as a subject and subject confrontation. Here, the reciprocal confrontation of beings who are aware of their uniqueness is claiming redemption from the loneliness. Communication is essential at this level, and Soloveitchik describes it as being limited in its efficiency. The communication helps in companionship. Additionally, Soloveitchik writes that in all unions like marriage and many others, the existence remains unique; however strong the bond is uniting two individuals and even sharing the same goal.

Furthermore, Soloveitchik concludes that philosophy and theological foundations are orthodoxies for modern Jews. His perception has led to more traditionalist and modernist of the community who believe he is the reason for their understanding of orthodoxy and what it represents (Rynhold, 2018). Soloveitchik contributed significantly to Jewish philosophy. In the book, lone of faith, Soloveitchik explores faith in analyzing Adam the first and Adam the second. Adam, the first, is interested in technology while Adam, the second is spiritual. Soloveitchik interoperates these two as significant to human nature. In conclusion, true faith is not easy has it require being close to God. Faith in Soloveitchik's thought is that it is lonely because it cannot be communicated to humans; thus, humanity needs faith.


Rynhold, D. (2018). Nietzsche, Soloveitchik, and contemporary Jewish philosophy (Vol. 24). Cambridge Univesity pres.

Shartz, D. (2016). Science and religious consciousness in the thought of Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik. pubfactory.

Wiliam, K. (2016). The last rabbi (Vol. 2). Indiana university press.

Cite this page

Free Essay: Singlehood in Gay Community. (2023, Oct 29). Retrieved from

Request Removal

If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the SpeedyPaper website, please click below to request its removal:

Liked this essay sample but need an original one?

Hire a professional with VAST experience!

24/7 online support

NO plagiarism