Tragedy Across the Mediterranean: "The Tale of Sohrab" - Free Paper Sample

Introduction

The Tale of Sohrab' from Shahnameh and the awfulness of Oedipus are both fixated on the predetermination that anticipates these heroes; Oedipus from birth and Rostam because of his child's nationality and his distinction and quality as a warrior. In spite of the fact that the stories are set in various topographical places and societies, Oedipus in Colonus while Rostam and Sohrab in Persia, they share a few similitudes and have a few contrasts too that can be featured. Therefore the essay below will clarify the similitudes and a portion of the distinctions in the stories with regards to the heroes in the accounts and argue for the quality or shortcomings in the two cases.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

Oedipus and Rostam

The two stories have renowned and praised heroes, Oedipus and Rostam, who are very much regarded in their time and perceived as legends to their kin. Both Rostam and Oedipus were viewed as saints according to their kin since they were watchmen of their kin. Rostam came back to his home in Persia since he thinks about his work to ensure the individuals of Persia to be more fabulous than his pleasure as a spouse and as a dad. Longo & Clausen (325) opined that Oedipus, comparably, murders the Sphinx that tortures his kin and, as a ruler, focuses on his kin even with a disaster and makes a move to get some information about the wellspring of the situation of his individuals. Another unmistakable association between the two legends is that the two of them slew significant and close relatives inadvertently (Longo & Clausen 321). Oedipus murdered his dad, Laius, in view of his pride that wouldn't let him yield during a contention between the two in their movement carts.

Sohrab, then again, longed to realize his introduction to the world dad since his mom, Tahmina, the princess, had kept the character undisclosed inspired by a paranoid fear of losing his child. The two stories come full circle in the incredible misfortune that is unresolvable. At long last, the two heroes experience an excess of misery at the acknowledgment of their deeds and make a move they see as revenge in their eyes. Rostam burns every one of his assets that he had amassed in his victories and surrendered his title as a powerful warrior. Oedipus, moreover, sentences himself to be ousted and to the life of a helpless, homeless person.

Qualities

Nonetheless, the heroes have a few contrasts too that can be featured by their characters and their encounters. As a matter of first importance, Rostam slaughtered his child, Sohrab, while Oedipus kills his dad, Laius. Oedipus is delineated as being enthusiastic and too affected to have faith in the prediction about his life. He is additionally reckless in the manner he handles the prescience and winds up limited by a similar fate he is dodging. Rostam, then again, is a joke artist saint and would prefer to win in the manner in spite of his respect (Longo & Clausen 323). Rostam ignores standard principles and respectable conduct of battle that expects one to kick the bucket in a macho manner when he faces demise.

In the Turan versus Persia war, whenever it appears that quite possibly he might be repressed, he utilizes trickiness to get away from death and later beat his child. This turned out ineffectively for Rostam in light of the fact that being blinded by the energy for winning, he wound up debilitating and killing his child. Rostam is additionally persevering and rash when he accepts that the end legitimizes the methods and isn't troubled by the guile he needs to use to endure. This makes him surprisingly unique in relation to Oedipus (Longo & Clausen, 321). Oedipus would rather save his fairness and uprightness from the individuals and rebuffs himself despite the fact that he was the ruler and had the ability to decline to step down and answer for his slip-ups (Cattaneo et al. el2) Additionally, to the natural eyes, his epic evoked pity than outrage since destiny from birth bound him subsequently; it would be passable on the off chance that he kept his seat.

What's more, Rostam was fulfilled at these words, and cast doubt from his soul, and went into the place of the King, and ate with him, and bewildered the hours with wine. Also, the King celebrated in his visitor and included him with sweet vocalists and all respect. Furthermore, when the night was fallen, the King himself drove Rostam unto a love seat perfumed with musk and roses, and he bade him sleep pleasantly until the morning. What's more, he pronounced to him once more that everything was well for him and for his horse.

Conclusion

In conclusion, these stories are more comparative than various, as in the two heroes' response to their activities. Their kin considers them legends, and they go about as so. Regardless of the physical setting of the stories, the tales are focused on the epic misfortune of the heroes at the most noteworthy snapshots of their lives. Despite the plot of the accounts, they all finish up with the lamentable finish of the heroes. Their spouses' lives likewise end at their failure to hold up under the reality of their better half's choices. The fluctuations in the plot of the misfortunes emerge because of the characters of the heroes, and along these lines, the likenesses far exceed the distinctions.

Work Cited

Cattaneo, Cristina, et al. "The forgotten tragedy of unidentified dead in the Mediterranean." Forensic Science International 250 (2015): e1-e2.

Longo, S. B., & Clausen, R. (2011). The tragedy of the commodity: the overexploitation of the Mediterranean bluefin tuna fishery. Organization & Environment, 24(3), 312-328.