Plant-Protein Diets: Quality, Cost & Socio-Demographic Drivers - Annotated Bibliography

The article characterizes on sociodemographic drivers of the plant-based protein diet concerning the cost and quality of the diet. The protein content has been at the front position of the many ingenuities in public nutrition, although it has been linked with various risks of diseases. The article involves a series of survey and research which are linked with food prices, especially on keen view of protein diet. Most of the results obtained show that protein consumption daily contributes to 16.8% of the daily energy consumption. A large percentage is based on the attitude of healthy eating and a combination of protein food (Aggarwal, A., & Drewnowski, 2019). Overall, the plant-based protein diet is a cost-effective approach that might improve the diet eminence in various levels of proceeds. Concerning this, there is a need to consider the content of the protein diet in both cases.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

The study of proteomics has been considered as an enormous fact mainly when it is applied to APH. This article considers various aspects related to APH; first, it provides a straightforward insight application and benefits of proteomics in diverse fields of APH. However, it gives possibilities on new trends and aims under which the APH applications arise. Lastly, there is an overview balance on significant activities and accomplishments which has preferences of cost action in farm animal proteomics (Almeida et al., 2015. Generally, the article has given the meaningful ways which can be used to reduce action as well as create a dedicated podium for proteomics.

Berrazaga, I., Micard, V., Gueugneau, M., & Walrand, S. (2019). The role of the anabolic properties of plant-versus animal-based protein sources in supporting muscle mass maintenance: a critical review. Nutrients, 11(8), 1825.

Plant-sourced proteins offer health and environmental assistances though they have a less anabolic effect than the animal proteins. Most of this is caused by lower digestibility and deficiency in essential amino acid content. The article evaluates the aptitude of plant versus animal-based proteins, which helps to uphold the skeletal muscle mass of a human being. It has also expounded on strategies which are being used to increase protein intake, which gives various response in one muscle changes and improvement (Berrazaga et al., 2019). If one increases the quality of protein intake, then there is a likelihood for compensation on lower anabolic prospective of the plant-based proteins. The article has estimated and reviewed four nutritional approaches that align with the protein diet. Most of its nutrition approach in the article has profoundly shown that older individuals may optimize the protein intake as they require high-quality content, which mitigates the age-related muscle loss.

Hou, Y., Wu, Z., Dai, Z., Wang, G., & Wu, G. (2017). Protein hydrolysates in animal nutrition: Industrial production, bioactive peptides, and functional significance. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 8(1), 24.

With the recent growth in industrial production, there has been a growing interest in how peptides work on animal nutrition. Most of the considered peptides in this article are formed through ingested proteins though other types vary significantly on its psychological conditions of the animal ingestion composition. Large peptides, as expressed in the article, are hydrolyzed to small peptides, which are now immersed into its enterocytes in a quicker way than amino acids. Some of the peptides which are explained have sources of both animal and plants. Usually, the review analysis has shown that 2-20 AA residues have an inclusion of animal protein hydrolyses (Hou et al., 2017). Overall, the comparison of animal and non- animal protein diet might optimize the nutrition in a manner which is more expressive of the nature of the diet composition.

Ramírez-Sánchez, O., Pérez-Rodríguez, P., Delaye, L., & Tiessen, A. (2016). Plant proteins are smaller because they are encoded by fewer exons than animal proteins. Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics, 14(6), 357-370.

The article has explained on various proteins analysis which harbors change on biological functioning. It has been found out that differences in protein length and domain might count some changes in phylogenetic lineages. The average protein size in plants has been considered as being small as compared to animals and fungi. Most of these changes are brought by unique lineages of the protein content (Ramírez-Sánchez et al., 2016. Therefore, proteins are encoded with diverse membrane. Overall, it is evident that plant have proteins which are larger than bacteria but smaller than in animals. This comparison is based on eukaryotic species, which suggest some of unique features.

References

Aggarwal, A., & Drewnowski, A. (2019). Plant-and animal-protein diets concerning sociodemographic drivers, quality, and cost: findings from the Seattle Obesity Study. The American journal of clinical nutrition, 110(2), 451-460.

Almeida, A. M. D., Bassols, A., Bendixen, E., Bhide, M., Ceciliani, F., Cristobal, S., ... & McLaughlin, M. (2015). Animal board invited review: advances in proteomics for animal and food sciences. Animal, 9(1), 1-17.

Berrazaga, I., Micard, V., Gueugneau, M., & Walrand, S. (2019). The role of the anabolic properties of plant-versus animal-based protein sources in supporting muscle mass maintenance: a critical review. Nutrients, 11(8), 1825.

Hou, Y., Wu, Z., Dai, Z., Wang, G., & Wu, G. (2017). Protein hydrolysates in animal nutrition: Industrial production, bioactive peptides, and functional significance. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 8(1), 24.

Ramírez-Sánchez, O., Pérez-Rodríguez, P., Delaye, L., & Tiessen, A. (2016). Plant proteins are smaller because they are encoded by fewer exons than animal proteins. Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics, 14(6), 357-370.