Conducting research is usually the cornerstone when writing a thesis, dissertation, or report (Mohajan, 2018). However, the overall quality and success of a study depend on the choice of a research methodology. It is, therefore, indispensable to identify the preliminary part of the research correctly. Identifying the right research methodology begins with understanding the correct research method that would effectively collect data (Basias & Pollalis, 2018). A case study research methodology is an empirical inquiry that explores theoretical models within a real-life setting (Mohajan, 2018). Case studies help in the exploratory and descriptive analysis of people, events, periods, institutions, policies, or events that are researched holistically through one or multiple methods to examine the causes of existing principles.
A case study research design enables the researcher to narrow down a wide realm of research into an easily investigable topic (Basias & Pollalis, 2018). Nonetheless, just like any other research method, the case study research design faces arguments for and against its efficiency in conducting research. Some scholars argue that since the case study method involves a significantly narrow field, it is impossible to extrapolate its results to fit an entire research question, and only provides a narrow example (Mohajan, 2018). Conversely, it is argued that it generates more realistic answers than an entirely statistical survey. Probably, the truth lies within the two, and it is possibly best to attempt and integrate the two methods. Conducting case studies is considered a valid approach, although it should be synergized with more general statistical processes (Lai & Roccu, 2019).
Another crucial thing about case studies is that they are flexible. As a pure researcher tries to attest or detest a hypothesis, a case study design can introduce novel and unanticipated results during the course leading to the research assuming new directions (Basias & Pollalis, 2018). Lastly, when reporting the study's results to others, case studies create interesting topics compared to pure statistical surveys. The general public usually presents reduced interest in studying results that involve multiple statistical calculations, although some upright case studies can render a strong impact (Mohajan, 2018).
A case study research design enables the researcher to concentrate on interesting and specific cases (Basias & Pollalis, 2018). Whether an attempt to explore a theory with a specific topic of interest, research must be exhaustive, and note-taking must be systematic and meticulous. The methodology's basic foundation is relevance and subject since, in a case study, the researcher deliberately tries to isolate a small research group or one specific population. In designing a case study, it is imperative to plan and schedule how to address the study and ensure that all collected data is relevant. Different from a scientific report, no rigid set of rules is provided; thus, the essential part is ascertaining that the study is concise and focused; otherwise, the researcher will accumulate vast irrelevant information (Lai & Roccu, 2019). The best way to ensure that the case study is on the right track is by shortlisting 4 or 5 research questions that the research aims to address: they are used as reference points (Mohajan, 2018). In a case study, it is crucial to be passive in the study more than a survey or questionnaire. The researcher acts more of an observer instead of an investigator and must remember that every case with multiple subjects should be addressed individually, enabling the researcher to draw cross-case conclusions.
Analyzing a case study's results is mostly opinion-based compared to statistical methods (Mohajan, 2018). The normal idea is to attempt to collate the data into a manageable method and develop a description around it. Using illustrations in the narrative while keeping the theories interesting and concise, is essential to demonstrate statistical data (Lai & Roccu, 2019). However, the researcher should remember that they are only attempting to describe trends and not explore every piece of information (Basias & Pollalis, 2018). However, the researcher should consistently keep referring back to their research questions so that they do not lose focus. It is wise to assume that the reader of the research may not have great knowledge of the subject, so the researcher should right simply in a focused manner. Moreover, different from scientific research, which majorly involves facts, a case study is derived from opinion and is highly designed to incite a logical debate; there is no wrong or right answer in a case study (Mohajan, 2018).
In exploring the topic, "Thriving in Wildfires: A Rough Ride to the Future for California's Tourism," the researcher aims to utilize a single case study to examine the phenomenon of the resilience of tourism destinations through disaster by gaining a better understanding of the opinions of California's tourism industry, which has been largely affected by wildfires over the last few years although it is still thriving. California is a US state, popularly known as a tourist destination for local and international tourists, famously for its wineries, parks, and beaches (Armijo, 2018). In 2019, it was reported to have registered more than 50 million tourists, a comparatively large number considering that it had experienced the disastrous wildfires of 2017 and 2018 (Bauman, Yuan, & Williams, 2020). The wildfires bring along significant challenges, including poor air quality and interstate closure of highways by smoke, which are significant issues for recreational and leisure visitors—the drawbacks of this event radiate to the tourism industry, especially on the image of tourist destinations. Moreover, California experienced more devastating wildfires in 2020, but the tourism industry remains resilient, and it is pulling through adequately (Bauman, Yuan, & Williams, 2020). The way the community responds to such disastrous events illuminates the complex relationships between humans and nature and influences a tourism destination's sustainability in the environmental, social, and economic aspects (Armijo, 2018).
Specifically, the study will focus on two counties, including Sonoma and Napa, which are major winery tourism destinations widely affected by wildfires. The researcher will explore the perceptions of the decision-makers responsible for steering disaster management responses that get the industry to sustainability. The researcher understands that the study's knowledge is relative, although not absolute, but it will employ empirical evidence to generate plausible claims (Bauman, Yuan, & Williams, 2020). The case study approach aligns with the aim of qualitative research: to accomplish an in-depth understanding of how people perceive their experience.
In collecting data, the researcher will employ semi-structured interviews. Semi-structured interviews will be employed since they play well alongside case studies as they allow open dialogue between the researcher and informants hence achieving more informative dialogue (Basias & Pollalis, 2018). This will supply the researcher with a bigger picture of the impacts of wildfire disasters on the industry, disaster management responses, stakeholder communication, and experiences in remaining resilient in the most accurate way. Using semi-structured interviews in a case study methodology will mitigate the need for further qualitative research to expand on the academic perception of resilience (Mohajan, 2018).
References
Armijo, P. (2018, November 19). Study: Short-lived economic hit from wildfires. Durango Herald. https://durangoherald.com/articles/250848
Basias, N., & Pollalis, Y. (2018). Quantitative and qualitative research in business & technology: Justifying a suitable research methodology. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 7, 91-105. https://sibresearch.org/uploads/3/4/0/9/34097180/riber_7-s1_sp_h17-083_91-105.pdf
Bauman, M. J., Yuan, J., & Williams, H. A. (2020). Developing a measure for assessing tourists; empathy towards natural disasters in the context of wine tourism and the 2017 California wildfires. Current Issues in Tourism, 23(19), 2476-2491. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2019.1681944
Lai, D., & Roccu, R. (2019). Case study research and critical IR: The case for the extended case methodology. International Relations, 33(1), 67-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117818818243
Mohajan, H. K. (2018). Qualitative research methodology in social sciences and related subjects. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 7(1), 23-48. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=640546
Cite this page
Navigating Insights: Case Study Research Unveiled in Understanding California's Tourism Resilience Amidst Wildfires. (2024, Jan 29). Retrieved from https://speedypaper.com/essays/navigating-insights-case-study-research-unveiled-in-understanding-californias-tourism-resilience-amidst-wildfires
Request Removal
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the SpeedyPaper website, please click below to request its removal:
- Essay Sample on Discouraging policies of the European Union
- What Characterizes a Good Research Argument According to Greene and Wise Beliefs? Essay Sample
- Paper Example. Background to the Problem
- Historical events (less than 60 words):
- Paper Example. Tourism as a Human Right
- Essay Sample on Mixed Method Design
- Hotel Brand Communication: Leveraging Social Media to Reach Clients - Research Paper
Popular categories