Essay type:Â | Compare and contrast |
Categories:Â | Creative writing Nietzsche |
Pages: | 5 |
Wordcount: | 1357 words |
Galileo's arguments challenge the religious ideas of his day while providing his view of our relationship to the world. While condemning people's perception of the truth, Galileo agrees with the knowledge passed to people by Copernicus, who bases his arguments on the functioning of celestial motions astronomically and using geometrics to provide observations and experiences. The Bible is the only known truth that cannot be contradicted or denounced by any individual. However, the challenge comes up during people's interpretation and understanding of biblical scriptures.
In most cases, individuals with doctrines quoting scriptures did it through their perception of what various verses meant. Despite the existence of the truth in biblical verses, people's understanding is often tuned towards satisfying their agenda. The absence of factual information supporting most writings based on people's perception of the bible cause confusion. Therefore, it is wise not to use the Bible to make any reliable conclusions. Additionally, according to Galileo and referring to other authors like Tertullian, nature, and the Bible are the only plain truths one can reveal God through. According to Tertullian, a statement that Galileo agrees with,
"We conclude that God is known first through Nature, and then again, more particularly, by doctrine, by Nature in His works, and by doctrine in His revealed word."
Nature and scripture equally reveal more about God. Besides, when looking at creation, God provided man with sense, intellect, and reason with the need for people to use them in denoting physical matters. A common argument is present on whether the earth rotates around the sun or vice versa. The scribes and the Bible does not provide any guidance on celestial beings. However, one factual truth is that the Holy Spirit, as ordained by God, has the purpose of guiding people on how to go to heaven and not the constitutes and functioning of heaven. Despite the close link on earth's or heaven's movement and the salvation of our souls, by faith, we are required to follow the intentions of the Holy Spirit.
Nietzsche Perception
Nietzsche created a parable about, The Madman, providing his view that God is indeed dead. Following his claims, one can attain much meaning in his perceptions. According to Nietzsche, before his existence, people had already killed God. Man requires to have faith in certain things to find the meaning of life (Beuving, 2012). Being an atheist, God did not exist anymore as no factual reasoning supports the notion the God is alive. Our senses and brains often believe something is valid as long as facts are supporting an argument.
As time continued, people evolved and started believing in other things. Renaissance began the shift followed by enlightenment, and then science came providing reasons behind the mysteries of the world (Beuving, 2012). Besides, individuals like Darwin provided their knowledge of the origin and how things came to existence. While arguing spirituality, Neitzsche was not focused on making people stop believing since it is vital to find the meaning of life, which some aspect of religion brings in our lives.
The inability to find factual proof supporting the connotation that God is alive endorses the belief that God is dead. As such, we must decide for ourselves the meaning of life because before His death, God was the primary purpose of living. Jesus, the son of God, had attributes that even Nietzsche admired. We cannot deny that God existed since that does not depict our existence despite any contradicting stories of origin (Beuving, 2012). Retaining the perception that God is dead only offers a guide for people to find life's meaning in something else. Whatever we have faith needs to be as high and purposeful as the existence of God in our lives was before his death. Finding life's purpose is the primary support of man while living.
Conversation between Nietzsche and Galileo
Galileo and Neitzsche meet abruptly while on Holiday. Their arguments and conversations on religion and spirituality never seize.
Galileo: Hello Neitzsche?
Nietzsche: Hello, my friend. Is it alright me referring to you as my friend despite our contradictory aspects in creation and religion? We always disagree.
Galileo: (Laughs) I mean we are friends, I'd say we have more of relating arguments that contradicting. We disagree to agree. For instance, people perceive that their understanding of various aspects is the truth. You have never got in-depth about the Bible, but people have twisted their understanding of scriptures as the truth in what God meant.
Nietzsche: Yes, my friend. The truth is currently diluted to suit people's perspectives. I am an atheist, so I do not believe in God or the Bible. Yes, He did exist in the past, but he died before me, and you existed in this world. If I were to look at things through your view, I would agree that denoting the meaning of biblical scriptures is not easy since our understanding of everything differs. As imperfect perfections, we tend to translate things to match what makes us happy. Having come into existence through God and saved by His son Jesus Christ, we have senses and the intellect to find the truth from facts.
Galileo: You have a point. I particularly loved your parable about The Madman. There is great sense in the parable. Still, this does not mean that I am denouncing my belief that God exists that we will always disagree about my friend. However, having been provided with senses, reasoning, and intellectual abilities, we need to identify that the Bible is hard to understand. As such, yes, our meaning of some scriptures will most likely differ. People's inability to understand the difference between the Bible and other physical entities creates a challenge in who we transform to become.
Nietzsche: Speaking about physical entities, sense, reasoning, and our intellectual abilities, many factual explanations supporting the origin of the world have significant meanings when compared to the Bible.
Galileo: (Quickly interjects) No Neitzsche, nothing will ever make sense and describe how the world came into existence than God, the Bible, and Nature. All the descriptions of creation by God are evident through nature. Despite science and Darwin providing stories opposing God as the creator and your views that He is dead, there are some things we will never fully understand. Look at the celestial motion, no scientific deduction or factual aspect will help us know what is beyond the heavens and how heaven functions. It is our duty, despite the Holy Spirit guiding us on finding a path to heaven other than understanding how things work to deduce our understanding.
Nietzsche: To that, I would rather we stick to facts. Yes, God did exist. His son is a great role model for me. However, using our reasoning, many things have changed in the world, and people's faith shifted to believing in entities with proof. No one has any idea if heaven exists. When we look up, it's the sky, sun, moon, and stars. I believe God existed in the beginning, but he died. If He did not and is alive, why has He allowed people to have faith in science and other perspectives of origin? The only thing we need to live great lives is a purpose. God was our initial purpose; then, other things came about. I will employ his teaching to my understanding and live a fulfilled life. But according to my knowledge, God is dead, and our ancestors killed Him.
Galileo: Our arguments will never seize. If we continue on this topic, many disagreements will surge.
Nietzsche: (Laughs loudly) It is good to see that you agree with me and accept defeat.
Galileo: (Laughing) We just had a conversation catching up, not a competition, my friend. We will always agree and disagree with one another, not unless you want to adopt my perspective.
Nietzsche: (Laughs) I will never change my view. Unless I meet God and have a conversation, anyway, we should sit down sometime talk more.
Galileo: Yes. Let us plan when we can spend more time. Goodbye, and take care.
Nietzsche: Goodbye, Galileo.
References
Beuving, M. (2012, August 22). How Nietzsche Killed God. Theology for Real Life | Eternity Bible College's Faculty Blog. https://facultyblog.eternitybiblecollege.com/2012/08/how-nietzsche-killed-god/#.V9lvjE2V8dU
Cite this page
Free Essay Example: Galileo's Perception. (2023, Oct 03). Retrieved from https://speedypaper.com/essays/galileos-perception
Request Removal
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the SpeedyPaper website, please click below to request its removal:
- Free Paper with a Literature Review on the Concept of Dehumanization
- Essay Example on Life Without Episodic Memories
- Essay Example Comprising the Interview with Seth Godin
- Literary Analysis Essay Sample of Kate Chopin's Story of an Hour
- Leadership Comparison. Free Paper
- Essay Sample on Exploring Aristotle's Views on Friendship: Utility, Pleasure, and Virtue
- Existence Precedes Essence - Free Paper Sample
Popular categories