Paper Example. Army Leadership Styles

In military and behavior science, the idea of leadership has been observed for a long time. Though there is no single, universally accepted in meaning of a leader, it has been optional that a leader is inventive during the pursuit to solve new problems, and brings different and new ideas to a group. In the behavior idea, there have been developed multiple theories that leaders have processed or exhibited. Military leadership can be divided into contrast, entailing transformational and transactional control styles. The latter are those leaders who help develop and grow orders, while the former are the leaders who only give orders. More precisely, transformational leaders use their charisma and charm to convince their subordinates and the participants of their dedication. The US Army is one of the places where leaders are skilled in their responsibilities and rudimentary leadership abilities; nonetheless, they can exhibit whatever style they like. This makes military leadership a very unique and desirable leadership style. This paper debits different military leadership styles and how they work.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

Transaction Leadership

Leadership style is not as effective as the transformational due to the reliant loot it brings around like awards, promotions points, and promotions. It is also associated with calculative commitment, but it declines the job sentimental commitment and motivation. Transactional leadership removes the guesswork that is highly operational in the line of command work structure implemented by military organizations. It also ensures that the leaders content their results by giving vibrant directions and ensuring that the subordinates are responsible for whatever they do. This type of style works by creating precise arrangements whereby the subordinates know what is expected of them, and the rewards they acquire for delivering the best services as outcome leaders identify subordinate requirements and honor them for their support and performance.

Transformational Leadership

Leaders in this style are charismatic. They inspire and motivate with intelligence, which bodes well with the servicewomen and men who discover themselves in aggressive conditions where decisive action and quick thinking are the only things they need to survive. This style has been found to have a positive association with the sentimental procedures of subordinates and cognitive. This type of leadership is also connected to the supporter agreement, whereby this type of leader tries to construct a communal identity in teams (Arnold et al., 2016). Moreover, leaders in this style are related amid the upper-rank officers as the lower rack officer are seen as less transformational and more passive. Transformational leadership chic can supplement the reduction in sentimental commitment and job motivation caused by transactional governance. The essence of this type of leadership in the military is adjusting means to share, end, and reform the organizations to achieve moral inspiration and extensive human determinations. This style is operative as the leaders use education and inspiration to encourage their minions. They allow the inferior to create value, need, and make decisions within soldiers. Most essential, this style implant a logic of egotism and create an apparition to advance subordinates' trust and respect.

Servant leadership

Military servicemen and women and officers get a chance to be in leadership one time of their lives during their military career. Although serving their county is their primary purpose for soliciting, these men and women are given a chance to lead a group. This type of leadership entails leading a small group of subordinates. It requires an essential level of trust between the subordinates and the leaders; thus, building a strong rapport and relationship. However, this is not a style that can be used all the time as it requires time to develop enough trust between the soldiers (Hamad, 2015). Servant leadership works in the military as the leaders embody all the servant leaders' features, a sense of community, a passion for assisting others, acceptance, and empathy.

Moreover, the act of servant leadership is not magic, and it is a modest tactic to put the requests of others first. Military bests who use a servant leadership style enrich their organizations with high confidence. Hence it facilitates the units to complete their tasks with prodigious urgency and upsurges their aptitude to contest and win.

Autocratic

The autocratic style is also referred to as authoritarian leadership. The Army leaders are expected to issue clear mission statements, goals, and directions and are decision-makers to their subordinates; thus, they use an autocratic style. This style mostly works effectively in environments containing life or death choices or wherever the decision-making course becomes fusty. The autocratic leaders in the military are the choice makers and demand diminutive to no contribution from their underlings (Brauner, 2016). Nevertheless, these leaders respect their minions, listen to views, and communicate excellently. It is a style that allows leaders to dictate work processes and methods. Leaders in this style have a pure idea of the task and converse their revelation of mission achievement. As of their governance style, these leaders are expected to make precise choices and have an excellent success rate.

References

Arnold, K. A., Loughlin, C., & Walsh, M. M. (2016). Transformational leadership in an extreme context. Leadership & Organization Development Journal.

Bove, V., &Brauner, J. (2016). The demand for military expenditure in authoritarian regimes. Defense and peace economics, 27(5), 609-625.

Hamad, H. (2015). Transformational leadership theory: Why military leaders are more charismatic and transformational? International Journal on Leadership, 3.