Alcohol Use Disorder - Paper Example

Introduction

The article's title is effective because it suggests key variables and the study population. The title builds the reader's curiosity to go through the research process. The illustration of key variables and the study population has allowed the title to support the major hypothesis. For example, the reader can predict that the article focuses on enhancing safety and well-being by choosing the right medication for alcohol use disorder. From this perspective, the title successfully plays its primary role – drawing the reader's attention and influencing them to read the article.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

Abstract

The abstract clearly and concisely summarizes the main aspects of the report. The abstract allows the reader to determine the article's relevance by communicating key findings. Thus, a reader without enough time to read the entire article can grasp key ideas. For example, the reader understands the research method and analysis, which determines the article's relevance. Furthermore, the abstract has clearly stated keywords that reveal the main ideas of the article. The abstract has also utilized minimal words, encouraging the reader the go through the entire text and grasp key ideas.

Problem

The introduction is relevant to the title; therefore, it has unambiguously stated the problem. The reader can easily identify the problem and relate it to the title and nursing filed. For instance, the instruction describes alcohol use disorder and its medication safety concerns, as stated in the title. This way, the introduction provides a positive first impression and establishes credibility with the reader, building a persuasive argument. The introduction prepares the reader for the article since they understand its overview. Thus, the introduction can be considered as an appropriate quantitative approach to describe the problem and relate it to nursing.

Hypothesis

Although the article does not clearly state the hypothesis, the abstract reveals it by introducing the title. According to Coughlan et al. (2017), the first few paragraphs of an article often provide the hypothesis by explaining the research's primary purpose. In this sense, the hypothesis is not always well-stated; the reader has to go through the abstract to determine what the author emphasizes. From this perspective, the article's hypothesis is consistent with the literature review and the conceptual framework, based on the title and abstract.

Literature Review

The literature review is up to date because the author has used the latest sources to support arguments and draw evidence. Coughlan et al. (2017) argue that a good literature review does not simply describe or summarize the article but illustrates a pose that led to a conclusion. In this regard, the literature review synthesizes and enhances an understanding of the title. The review identifies areas of prior scholarship to avoid duplication, giving credit to the researchers, and drawing a new study basis.

Conceptual Framework

The article defines key concepts conceptually by illustrating the reader's expectations. The conceptual framework describes the relevant variables for the article and shows how they relate to each other. For example, the reader can realize the effects of improper medication on alcohol use disorders. Alcohol-related consequences and their medication are a critical theoretical framework for the article, as the author establishes some rues, facts, and principles to obtain accurate results. For example, several alcohol users are observed for different periods to draw a reasonable comparison on alcohol-related consequences.

Protection of Human Rights

The article employs an appropriate procedure to safeguard human rights for the participants. The conceptual framework helps the researcher in identifying indicators for human rights assessment, using an effective methodological approach to populate the indicators with meaningful data. For instance, men and women who met DSM-5 criteria were provided with medication to promote their safety and well-being. In this sense, the article methodology complied with nursing ethical standards. The methodological approach helped the study minimize risks and maximizer benefits to participants by offering medication. Participants who revealed alcohol use disorder symptoms were treated using the right medication.

Research Design

The study used the most rigorous design to meet its primary purpose. Randomized controlled experiments helped the researcher to determine behavioral interventions for people with alcohol use disorder. For instance, participants were given 600 mg of double-blind GE-XR twice a day or a computerized behavioral intervention for six months. These different medications allowed the researcher to compare the results and conduct efficacy analyses after a four-week treatment period. Thus, data collection points were appropriate since the experiments were given enough time to provide accurate results. The design minimized biases and threats to the internal, external, and construct validity of the study by using the double-blind GE-XR.

Data Collection

The study uses experimental research that requires the researcher to adhere to scientific research design strictly. In this case, the researcher gives participants different medications to determine particular treatments' efficacy and safety. Key variables are operationalized using appropriate experiments that align with the study's primary purpose. Specific instruments, such as DSM-5 criteria, effectively determined participants who used large amounts of alcohol and chose their treatment. In this regard, the DSM-5 shows that the data collection methods yielded reliable and valid data.

Procedures

The article reveals a computerized behavioral intervention for treating participants who were diagnosed with alcohol use disorder. The intervention is adequately described throughout the randomized control trials that allow the researcher to test different random order interventions. However, the research does not draw evidence whether the participants allocated to the intervention received it. Despite the lack of intervention evidence, the staff who collected data were appropriately trained – they were medical professionals.

Results

The study conducts analyses to address each research question. It uses the test of statistical inference to determine the safety and efficacy of particular alcohol use disorders. Qualitative research methods support the study's statistical analysis. For example, the samples suggest that 28.3 percent of the population consists of people with the disorder. The study uses appropriate statistical methods, descriptive and inferential analysis, to compare the results. The descriptive and inferential analytic methods were most effective because they helped the researcher control the confounding variables. Most importantly, Type 1 and Type 2 errors have been avoided as the study uses a low alpha and beta value. The intervention performed the intention-to-treat analysis by analyzing participants according to their original group assignment. The analysis facilitates a meta-analysis by using quantitative methods that provide sufficient information, useful for EBP.

Conclusion

The study findings seem valid because they can apply in the clinical setting. According to HHS (2019), healthcare professionals should choose the most appropriate treatment option for alcohol use disorder. A combination of treatments may work best for some people, while others require specific medication. In this regard, the study conducts various experiments to determine the safety and efficacy of particular treatments. It also recommends particular outpatient programs useful for people with less alcohol consumption effects (HHS, 2019). The medical experiments reflect meaningful evidence that is useful in nursing practice. Nurses can use the experiments to determine the appropriate medication for a specific person with alcohol use disorder.

References

Coughlan, M., Cronin, P., & Ryan, F. (2017). Step-by-step guide to critiquing research.