Free Essay. The Rational, Natural, And Open Systems of Organizations

The system that is adopted in any organization depicts the edifice in which it is likely to operate as it interacts with external along internal factors. Therefore, the system of the organization integrates the set up counting on each division in the hierarchies, business, as well as the way communication streams from the high management to the universal employees, hence affecting the way they interact with customers (Ng et al., 2015). Numerous theories designate as well as explain any strategy that is taken in the organization, and these count on the rational, natural, along open system.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Order now

The structure of the business informs all the employees about the work as well as what is required from them by the business. Besides, this instance offers every person the purpose, thus, contributing to the goals and objectives of the organization. The structure of the business is vital to eliminating challenges that relate to the misunderstanding of the employee, leading to communication breakdown. Whatever structure is adopted by the business, sets the organization apart from others, offering them a gain or weakening their place in the market.

Defining characteristics

The organizational system of rational depicts formality in the association that hexes out each member's function. They work as a group by completing the work of each other towards the accomplishment of their objectives. One of the rational system's characteristic is the exposition of highly dignified social structures. These show special attention on specified as well as formalized systems in attaining the goals of the organization. Max Weber theorized modernization rise in rationalism favor at the beginning of the twentieth century (Scott, 2007). He illustrated the rational system characteristics to comprise aspects like organizations, along with institutions that maintain the bureaucratic system.

The other characteristic is their technical competency adoption like computers as well as the internet for various activities, including marketing. However, this case influences focus on specialized work leading to impersonality in the organization because of the overpopulation. The approach advanced from Calvinism, thus, their focus on discipline as well as time as vital to meeting their goals.

The natural structure advances informal as well as interpersonal systems in the workplace. However, this approach developed to respond to the system of rational that enhanced conventionalism withing the organization. It embraces a purposeful model where foundations get their meaning from social edifices. Functionalism also indorses the impression that society comprises several different components that arise together, functioning independently to achieve the needs of society. Therefore, the natural system view associations as the organic structure evolving spontaneously via indeterminate events. The approach suggests that the superseding objectives of the society are survival hence requiring the adaptation of various changes (Scott, 2007). The system's characteristic comprises the focus on behavior as well as implementation as compared to other attributes like decision-making. According to some specialists, the natural system recognizes that the objectives cannot be unitary, but plural and the organization differentiate between official as well as state ones from operative and real (Scott, 2007). In the bible, the book of Galatians chapter 3 verse 28 recognizes the essentials to adopt as well as accept differences and diversity in all associations like the way Jesus Christ did, and there is no need to differentiate males, females, Gentiles or Jews (Scott, 2007).

The organization's open system developed in the 1960s, and it was to show the relationship existing between the organization along with its external environment (Vidal et al.,2017). It emerged after World War II to respond to the prevailing theories like human relations perspective by Elton Mayo and administrative theories by Henri Fayol. It also influences communication and information flow in the external as well as internal environment of the organization. In this instance, the environment includes factors affecting the business, and these may include social, political, or economic forces and may count on customers, competitors, and regions where every business operates (Vidal et al.,2017). It also disturbs the resources used in the organization to sustain and make sure it survives.

The open system comprises characteristics like an active interface with their surrounding by the activities that solicit feedback as the message is being passed. It also includes various subsystems as well as departments that labor interdependently to achieve the goals of the organization. The organizations that use these systems interrelate with their surrounding by advertisements, lobbies, and marketing research.

Comparison Between the Three Systems

While the three structures have some variances concerning their nature as well as the way they enhance organizational activities, they also include certain features of each other. Some of these variances among the system's perspectives resulted from varying experiences as well as the researcher's backgrounds. The rational system, the engineer, named Taylor, propounded the theory of scientific management to enhance the productivity of labor in industries. Others, like Mooney and Fayol, also had a number of managerial experiences (Ng et al., 2015). Their suggestion, however, anchored towards formality introduction as well as structural establishments. These angles were dissimilar from other scholar's positions especially those who were in the natural system. Most of them, like Philip Selznik, Pearson, as well as Mayo, had academic backgrounds (Alford, 2020). Therefore, their take, as well as views, depended on what was shown in their scholarly teachings as a suitable fit. They were against conventionalism and suggested the destruction of such walls, which leads to information flow as well as informal interactions.

Another difference existing between natural and rational systems is that both of them focused on different institutions with varying notches in structuration existing in various environments. While natural systems focused on professional as well as service entities like hospitals and schools, rational concentrated on state bureaucracies and industries. The rational system's focus is on the individual's task in an organization as the natural investigate the aspects like commitment along with motivation.

The link between two systems implies that regardless of the differences, the natural, as well as rational, are the same in close approach adoption in contrast to the open system. Both of them concentrate on performing their purpose at the structural analysis level by looking at the way the work of each employee contributes to the organization and impact the interactions of the general work. The closed system trails a business's stringent order as well as allows less obliteration from outside sources (Ng et al., 2015). Even though such businesses concentrate on the internal factors, they also interact freely with the exterior environments. Open systems are flexible compared to others and allow the unrestricted information flow as well as contact with exterior factors.

Also, as the natural system concentrated on the behavior of the human being as well as their influence on the organization's influence, the open system focusses on the external environment encompassing a complicated variety of factors. As a result, this system looked for an interdependent association with external aspects affecting its process in all ways. An example of closed trades comprises assembly appearances where the employees concentrate on their duties without bearing in mind what is progressing in the exterior environment or other departments as well as managerial meetings (Alford, 2020). They observe specific rules as well as guidelines that need their close attention to their activities in a way that any action taken outside their activities may influence productivity as well as deal away with the schedules.

Most commerce has preferred an open system to others and encompasses the service industry like hotel business as well as the companies that offer various goods as well as services (Vidal et al.,2017). Open systems are supple, and even if one department fails, this does not alter the entire business. They are accommodating as well as ready to include necessary changes any time there is a need. However, this instance varies from closed structures that are unbending to change as well as seek to sustain their traditional operational methods at all instances. Romans chapter 12, verse 2, advises against conventionality and ask Christ-followers to analyze all situations as well as change accordingly (Alford, 2020).

Theoretical Viewpoint

All these systems rational, open, as well as natural systems, have different theorists as well as approaches to them. For the rational tactic, these count on the school of scientific management that was introduced by Fredrick W. Taylor in the 1880s along with the 1890s. The theory supported the organization to analyze its tasks scientifically and get the strategies, which will lead to maximum production with the resources' minimum input. This theorist alleged in time as well as motion study usage to improve the aspects of management, leading to preferable productivity. The other theory of administrative distillates on focusing on the entire organization as well as focusing on controlling, organizing, as well as planning the duties of management among workers.

Henri Fayol developed a theory and this was to enable the organizational analysis as a whole. The bureaucracy theory of Max Weber also fits in the system of ration since it promotes the utilization of different types of power, that is, charismatic, legal, as well as traditional rational to impose administrative structures (Turan, 2015). The other theory is the decision-making model, and this concentrates on the formal factors of the organization comprising individuals. Herbert Simon established a theory that was used to criticize the take of the scientific approach on the employees' economical nature (Vidal et al.,2017).

Also, the natural system acquires support from many schools of thought counting on Mayo as well as human relations school. Nevertheless, this aspect achieved its support from the famous experiments of Hawthorne in the 1930s (Blaschke, 1970). The study's results implied that other features like social needs motivated employees to perform their activities better. In the book of Luke, chapter 6:31 encourages the employee's fair treatment by considering their wishes beyond monetary compensation (Blaschke, 1970). It also focuses on the person like the scientific tactic, even though it concentrates on formal features that affect productivity.

Another school is the theory of the cooperative system that was supported by Bernard. It encourages the aspects of formality and implies that an association exists via three elements, which include communication between parties, having a mutual purpose, and willingness to serve. The institutional approach of Philip Selznik established that even though organizations are paraphernalia for specific purposes of achievement, they are also autonomous with their lives (Blaschke, 1970). The philosopher believes that prescribed structures cannot overcome the non-rational organizational behavior's dimensions since the employees add supplementary to commerce beyond rational decision-making.