Is democracy threatened by social unrest and the rise of Latin Americas left?

Published: 2019-10-29 09:30:00
697 words
3 pages
6 min to read
Type of paper: 
This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

YES: Barreto, A. A. from, American Identity, Congress, and the Puerto Rico Statehood Debate in a journal, Studies In Ethnicity & Nationalism (2016).

NO: Kurtz, L. R. from the book, Encyclopedia of violence, peace & conflict (2008).


YES: Barreto, A. A quantifies that perceived changes within the social justice agenda realize sovereignty as well as democracy, and as a result, eliminate potentially existing colonialism perspectives for residents and citizens of a country.

NO: Kurtz, L. R., an authentic American historian, nullifies the agenda set here as social unrest demonstrates a lack of ability for the government, which is defined as a people for the people and made by the people as per the constitution for both the demonstrators and those who are considered protagonists. As such, he points out that the only way forward would be to break this covenant, hence achieving statehood as evidenced by other sovereign countries.

The relevance of the agenda behind social unrest is a perceived constitutional obstacle with reference to H.R. 1445 which happens to be the voice of reason the House of Representatives who are composed of chosen members from different states. With regards to this, the arguments supporting H.R. 1433 nullify the such social actions especially if they endanger the lives of others reported and observed and that makes social unrest unacceptable. On the other hand, it is important to note that the social unrest validates the lack of democracy as it appears to be one of the last options the public takes in response to mistreatment and lack of consideration by the elected government. This is because the legislates representatives that bargains for the area they represent but when the people come up against the government then it means the government is utterly losing its grip and purpose (Kurtz, 2008).

The factual reasoning behind the social unrest would be because the government or those in authority have failed to align themselves with the testament of the constitution or are ruling by force. As a result, the people are responsible for taking back power through social unrest which in many times ends up in bloodshed since those in power do not necessarily go for the idea held by the public. (United States, 2007).

Even though it could be established that the reason behind social unrest is acceptable and could be tolerated, it is only in the case where it does not lead to the harm of others. Assuming this is the case, then the constitution allows for the public to express their thoughts regarding a particular matter having considered all other formal avenues impractical or already exhausted.

The fallacy as instituted by many critics who stand in the name of civil rights or working with civil society organizations is the fact that there reaches a point where there is no other alternative to turn the tables other than social unrest. On the other hand, it is only plausible to state that democracy can be maimed by the rise of Latin America or social unrest. If both cases come as a result of the minority seeking a place that is already occupied by their representative then it becomes null and void, and legal action should be taken against the perpetrators.

According to my perception, Barreto, A. A., has a better analogy because his thesis stands for a better future regarding democracy and the constitution backs him up. In relation to this, I believe he is the most analytical. Nonetheless, both authors provide unbiased standings as proven by the law and the constitution of the United States. To my reasoning, Barreto, A. A. is most correct since his agenda is aligned to a greater future for democracy. Recent updates on this topic are pushing third world countries to embrace democracy even as the West tries to deal with countries experiencing social or terrorist group unrest.


Barreto, A. A. (2016). American Identity, Congress, and the Puerto Rico Statehood Debate. Studies In Ethnicity & Nationalism, 16(1), 100-117

Kurtz, L. R. (2008). Encyclopedia of violence, peace & conflict: Vol 3. Amsterdam [etc.: Elsevier.

United States. (2007). Puerto Rico: Hearing before the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, United States Senate, One Hundred Ninth Congress, second session ... November 15, 2006. Washington: U.S. G.P.O.


Request Removal

If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the SpeedyPaper website, please click below to request its removal: